6 new categories and 72 new items added to the shop!Fake forum EC for posting doubled everywhere to help pay for them!
0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.
I disagree: that's only a sign of how much a character gives nerdz the horn.
Quote from: Valka on March 23, 2014, 04:30:27 AMI always felt their should have been a DS9 I couldn't disagree with both of you more about Seven of Nine. She's my favorite Voyager character.Well their has always been a character 'searching for their humanity' in every series, from Spock, Data, Odo, Seven and T'Pol (though you might argue T'Pol is searching for an understanding of humanity rather then her own). So I don't object to that premise, again it just comes down to bad writing, everyone on Voyager is badly written Seven included, is she the worst, no not by a long shot. I think Harry Kim takes the cake on that one. (Yes even worse then Kes, you actually REMEMBER Kes, you literally forget Kim even exists)Buster: I agree Bakula acting skill was good and he used that to compensate for bad writing, the rest of the cast was far weaker and could not compensate. I think the writers even knew this on some level and the Archer character ended up shouldering a disproportionate share of the whole series compared to TNG which did a good job of spreading out the material among the whole cast and developing all the characters fully. The wooden-crew syndrome was self-reinforcing, weak actors get lower quality writing and less screen time, leading to weaker character development and poorer writing in a downward spiral. The Captain character alone can not sustain a Series for more then 1-2 years, a series lifespan is directly proportional to how many compelling characters it can develop, in TNG & DS9 it was the whole cast, in Voyager (in my opinion) no one and in Enterprise just 2.
I always felt their should have been a DS9 I couldn't disagree with both of you more about Seven of Nine. She's my favorite Voyager character.
COUGHmakesthemhornyCOUGH Quote from: Impaler on March 23, 2014, 05:15:11 AMQuote from: Valka on March 23, 2014, 04:30:27 AMI always felt their should have been a DS9 I couldn't disagree with both of you more about Seven of Nine. She's my favorite Voyager character.Well their has always been a character 'searching for their humanity' in every series, from Spock, Data, Odo, Seven and T'Pol (though you might argue T'Pol is searching for an understanding of humanity rather then her own). So I don't object to that premise, again it just comes down to bad writing, everyone on Voyager is badly written Seven included, is she the worst, no not by a long shot. I think Harry Kim takes the cake on that one. (Yes even worse then Kes, you actually REMEMBER Kes, you literally forget Kim even exists)Buster: I agree Bakula acting skill was good and he used that to compensate for bad writing, the rest of the cast was far weaker and could not compensate. I think the writers even knew this on some level and the Archer character ended up shouldering a disproportionate share of the whole series compared to TNG which did a good job of spreading out the material among the whole cast and developing all the characters fully. The wooden-crew syndrome was self-reinforcing, weak actors get lower quality writing and less screen time, leading to weaker character development and poorer writing in a downward spiral. The Captain character alone can not sustain a Series for more then 1-2 years, a series lifespan is directly proportional to how many compelling characters it can develop, in TNG & DS9 it was the whole cast, in Voyager (in my opinion) no one and in Enterprise just 2.They had trouble casting the leads half the time; Brooks and Mulgrew were in over their heads/miscast. You can't overcome terrible writing, and you can't work around the star of the show sucking.
And Kes was accompanied by Nelix.
Um... I harbor exactly ZERO sexual feelings for either Jeri Ryan or Robert Duncan MacNeil. Kate Mulgrew was better than the actress they originally had to play Janeway.I hardly read any DS9 fanfic.
I Think BU meant that the quantity of fan-fiction about a certain character is proportional to their fan-base wide sex-appeal, not that your reading choices were determined by your such feelings. It's just statistically more likely that 7of9 will be the subject of any randomly selected fan-fiction.
Who was originally cast to play Janeway?