Real-Life Barbie? Model Created Look to Spread Beliefs

[Buster's Uncle]

Real-Life Barbie? Model Created Look to Spread Beliefs
LiveScience.com
Benjamin Radford, LiveScience Bad Science Columnist  3 hours ago
 

Russian model Valeria Lukyanova transformed herself into what appears to be a real-life Barbie doll

 
A young Russian model who reportedly spent a half-million dollars to turn herself into a real-life Barbie doll is indeed quite real and not the result of a computer-generated image.

Even so, many of the stories written about her are not the real deal.

In 2012, photos of this supposed real-life Barbie named Valeria Lukyanovashocked many around the world. Thousands of photos of Lukyanova showed her porcelain face with flawless skin, glassy blue eyes, a blank stare and small waist, which were apparently the result of dozens of surgeries (including, allegedly, having ribs removed).

When Lukyanova first appeared, no one knew quite what to make of her — or her appearance. Some people thought she was a computer-generated product of a viral video hoax. Others pointed to her as a horrific example of the pursuit of beauty gone awry, the sad consequence of a society in which girls are encouraged to view thin fashion models and Barbie dolls as ideals. She is quite real, though many of the stories about her are not.



A real-life Barbie?

Contrary to many headlines, there's no evidence that Lukyanovais actually trying to emulate the world's most popular doll; the word "Barbie" does not appear anywhere onLukyanova's website nor in any of the available material attributed to her. Furthermore, a Google search of images of Lukyanova reveals plenty of airbrushed glamour shots, but conspicuously absent are photos of her with her supposed idol, Barbie. Surely if this aspiring model's claim to fame were centered on trying to achieve Barbie's supposedly idealized proportions, she would have taken many photos of her with the doll she's trying to look like.

A recent short documentary film, "Space Barbie," provides new insight into her motives. Lukyanova doesn't mind comparisons to Barbie, but states: "Even though people call me Barbie, I never tried to look like a doll. I just like everything beautiful, feminine and refined. It just so happens that dolls are based on the image of refined girls."

So what does explain her strange appearance? It's amazing what can be done with flattering lighting, hours of makeup and low-resolution video. Some images of her may be digitally enhanced, but despite a few YouTube videos to the contrary, there is little or no evidence that Lukyanova has undergone extensive plastic surgery, either to look like Barbie or for any other reason. It's possible, though there are no before-and-after photos or videos that you would expect to see for such a publicized radical transformation. Surely any plastic surgeon would be eager to claim credit for such remarkable work on such a famous and controversial client.

It's also important to remember that people come in all shapes and sizes, and Lukyanova's figure and features, though striking, are within normal human variation. Critics concerned about the influence of Barbie dolls on girls and women often claim that 99.99 percent of the women in the world don't look like Barbie. While that may be true, statistically that means there are thousands of women whose natural body shape (perhaps with a little help) comes pretty close. And it's not surprising that one of those women — especially one with Lukyanova's self-promotional skills — would be noticed and become an Internet sensation.

The fact is that Lukyanova never claimed to want to look like Barbie — that was simply a convenient (and inaccurate) news handle for journalists and headline writers to use. Though the fascination with Lukyanova's (beautiful or creepy, take your pick) appearance is understandable, it is only skin deep. To understand Lukyanova's motivations you must look below the surface.



'Out-of-body' traveler

Lukyanova has made no secret of her motivation for fame, and it has nothing to do with Barbie. She claims to be an extraterrestrial spirit, and in "Space Barbie" explains: "The aim of my life is to come to this planet to help people realize that it is necessary to move from the role of the 'human consumer' to the role of 'human demi-god.' Everything is love, love is God. I am you, and you are me."

While this may sound far-out, it is actually a fairly typical example of New Age philosophy, preaching that humans are on the wrong path with war and pollution, and that humankind can be saved through the a cosmic, karmic consciousness shift toward universal love. The only thing that makes this situation unusual is the appearance of the person delivering the message — and it's no accident.

Lukyanova notes that "I'm a lecturer on the subject of out-of-body travel, and I lead seminars on spiritual subjects. My PR is only based on my physical appearance. Unfortunately spiritual ideas will never get so much attention. If a nun starts talking about spirituality, would anyone notice her? No, no one will. But if a beautiful, inspiring young woman starts talking about it, many people will start thinking. So I use my appearance to promote my spiritual ideas. It works perfectly well."

Indeed it does. Lukyanova is neither a media-obsessed woman trying to fit some social ideal of female perfection, nor a Photoshopped hoax. Her ideas may be far-out, but when it comes to finding ways to spread her New Age message, she's crazy like a fox.

http://news.yahoo.com/real-life-barbie-model-created-look-spread-beliefs-123622110.html

It really struck me, when I started seeing stories about this chick last year, that there was a lot of crappy journalism going on - a cursory innerwebs search and poking around her website demonstrated that she was a flying saucer freak, and that that deeply informed the way she presented herself.  It's a 'flying saucer people are super advanced and will come to save us all' idea of perfection.  If you search around, you'll find similar looks sported by lots of people into new age flying saucer religions - all spandex space uniforms, and made up into a plastic sort of perfection.

Even this article presents it as simple self-promotion -a reasonable assumption when dealing with a model/new age singer/guru- but I think that's only part of the deal with her.

Her singing isn't bad, BTW, if you like that kind of thing (which you really shouldn't).

And it's very crap journalism to include a single picture which doesn't even show her 'barbie' eyes (makeup appliances), let alone her amazingly tiny waist.











Just a skinny girl with a boob job, a lot of makeup, and a strange religious belief, if you ask me.  No shooping or rib-removal need apply.

---

Edit:  This thread has suffered a great deal of link-rot - if you skip to the bottom of p.25 and onward, you'll find attached pics still there...

[Buster's Uncle]

Inexplicably, I keep seeing lurkers looking at this thread.

I mean, explicably if they're not bots, but even then, I'd love to know how they're finding a thread six months buried...

[Buster's Uncle]

-Incidentally, I'd like to mention that Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri is an awesome game, and that this forum welcomes new members and treats them right.

[Buster's Uncle]

[Buster's Uncle]

...This is the second-most viewed thread in the Our researchers have made a breakthrough! forum, and the other is 2.5 years older, to this one's 6 months...

[Geo]

Yeah, you keem bumping it.

[Buster's Uncle]

This was going on before February, when it was six-months buried.  And go look how many pages back articles posted 2 Feb. are now.

[Buster's Uncle]

Three week buried, now at the bottom of page 11, and I've been three lurkers here today - on a day I was AFK a lot...

[Buster's Uncle]

It's not that Ms. Lukyanova isn't interesting - aside from her arresting looks, her belief set only adds to the natural fascination.  It's just that I'm dying of curiosity whether this thread is turning up on search engines, or someone has posted a link somewhere, or what.  The lurkers are an international crowd, and they've been all over this thread today...

[Geo]

It's the pictures, dummy.

[Buster's Uncle]

No, if your tastes run to skinny at all, she's smokin' hot.  I get that, not being blind.  You can't go wrong with big eyes and a small waist.

But how are they finding this when it's 11 pages back?  When it was buried for six months?  It's not random browsing, even allowing for lingering long over the bikini shots.

I should go find more bikini shots, BTW.

[Buster's Uncle]

This one enlarges when you click on it, BTW.



Definitely worth doing.

[Geo]

But how are they finding this when it's 11 pages back?  When it was buried for six months?  It's not random browsing, even allowing for lingering long over the bikini shots.

Theez peeps come from outside the forum? Like in, googling her pics and going straight to the thread from their search page?

[Buster's Uncle]

That's my best guess --- but can she be THAT much of a hot topic?  I mean, surely all these pics -100% of which are linked from somewhere else- are easier to find somewhere else.  Is she that big a 'net superstar?  The only thing unique here at all is my remarks, which aren't really hard enough on her flying saucer religion to piss fans/coreligionists off too badly, I hope, nor all sensitive and supportive to draw them for that.

[shrugs] Much of my interest in Valaria Lukyanova is just the Barbie angle 'cause Mylochka's into Barbie, and a lot of the rest is pretty girl pictures.  The religion part is spice.  What's directing random people/fans/detractors/whoever here, though?

[Buster's Uncle]

What the heck.  I really enjoy looking at her.