WHITE Rameses II and the case for racial representation and why it matters.

[Buster's Uncle]

-Usually on wood, and I'm talking from memory.

[Unorthodox]

Sigh. 

You prefer dna results?

https://www.science.org/content/article/scientists-thought-ancient-egyptian-mummies-didn-t-have-any-dna-left-they-were-wrong#:~:text=Whereas%20the%20mummies'%20soft%20tissue,the%20power%20plants%20of%20cells.

TLDR found to be Levantine which would support a range of complexion. 

Or, you know the actual tomb carvings/paintings that have varied complexions within the same tomb such as the tomb off Nakht and Tawny among others. 

[Buster's Uncle]

I'm not sure what we're arguing?

[Buster's Uncle]

I mean, ancient Egypt was a lot of people for a very long time, and it would be outrageous to assume there wasn't plenty of variation, especially with that top corner of Africa being a natural crossroads.  (-But surviving pigment in art still being incredibly old and maybe not real reliable for reasons already mentioned and extreme oldness.)  This I believed from the get-go.

-And that a medium to light brown complexion for RamII was the best guess...  Do I need to burn a couple hours again cutting out the skin parts of the original to depict my best guess?  It's not real different than the intermediate alter, just somewhat lighter w/ original lips.

[Unorthodox]

I agree a middle of the road coloration would have been the wisest course of action, but there are plenty of potential sources and motivations for what they chose.  Thus I don't know that I would come out and call it inherently wrong. 

[Buster's Uncle]

Blue eyes, especially, seems hard to justify - I'm completely unaware of the merest HINT of Rams having any northern blood in him...

So I do stand behind my original remarks at this point....

[BU Admin]

...I recently heard he had red hair...