NASA Seeks New Ideas for Kepler Telescope's Mission

[Buster's Uncle]

NASA Seeks New Ideas for Ailing Planet-Hunting Spacecraft's Mission
SPACE.com
Mike Wall 12 hours ago
 

An artist's interpretation of the Kepler observatory in space.

 
NASA is asking scientists for ideas about new ways to use its Kepler space telescope, whose planet-hunting mission was stalled by a malfunction three months ago.

The space agency issued a call for new mission proposals on Friday (Aug. 2) to help prepare for the likelihood that Kepler will never fully regain its health, which was compromised in mid-May when the second of Kepler's four orientation-maintaining reaction wheels failed. This robbed the instrument of its precision-pointing ability.

"If one of the two reaction wheels cannot be returned to operation, it is unlikely that the spacecraft will resume the nominal Kepler exoplanet and astrophysics mission," Kepler officials wrote in the request for ideas. "The purpose of this call for white papers is to solicit community input for alternate science investigations that may be performed using Kepler, and are consistent with its probable two-wheel performance."



Balky wheels

The main goal of the $600 million Kepler mission is to determine how commonly Earth-like exoplanets occur throughout the Milky Way galaxy. The spacecraft detects alien worlds by noting the tiny brightness dips caused when the planets pass in front of their parent stars from Kepler's perspective.

The observatory needs three functioning gyroscope-like reaction wheels to perform this precision work. The spacecraft had four wheels when it launched in March 2009 — three for immediate use and one spare.

But one wheel, known as number 2, conked out in July 2012. And then number 4 failed on May 11 of this year, bringing Kepler's exoplanet hunt to a halt.

Over the last three months, engineers have been working to recover at least one of the failed wheels. The engineers have had some success, getting both of them to spin in the last few weeks. However, both wheels still exhibit much higher friction levels than a healthy wheel would.

Wheel 4's friction is so high, in fact, that engineers are excluding it from future tests, Kepler mission manager Roger Hunter, of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., wrote in an update Friday. But the team will put wheel 2 through some more paces, seeing if it can be used to help point the spacecraft — coarsely at first, and then finely, as needed for the collection of science data.

"The team anticipates beginning the pointing performance testing on Thursday, August 8, 2013, and will continue into the following week if all goes well," Hunter wrote. "A determination of whether Kepler can return to exoplanet data collection is expected a couple weeks after these pointing tests are complete."

Sending astronauts out to fix Kepler, as was done five separate times with NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, is not an option. Kepler orbits the sun rather than Earth and is currently millions of miles from our planet.



A new mission?

The odds that Kepler will recover fully and resume its previous operations are not great, mission team members say.

"It's not going to go back to its original mission; it's going to be something less than that," Kepler deputy project manager Charlie Sobeck, also of NASA Ames, told SPACE.com late last month. "But how much less, and how much usefulness it'll have — it's really still very much up in the air."

So NASA and the Kepler team have begun to think about possible alternate missions for the spacecraft, which is why they made the new request for ideas.

Proposals are due by Sept. 3. The Kepler team will spend two months reviewing the suggestions, then submit an initial report to NASA Headquarters by Nov. 1. An official proposal for a repurposed Kepler is slated to be completed by Feb. 1, 2014, with a decision about funding expected shortly thereafter. The new science mission would then begin in the summer of 2014, if all goes according to the currently envisioned plan.

"If an appropriate science case(s) and cost envelope is found, the repurposed mission will continue to be operated out of NASA Ames Research Center and make use of the nominal mission project office personnel and expertise already in place," the request for ideas states.

To read the call for white papers, visit http://keplerscience.arc.nasa.gov/News.shtml#TwoWheelWhitePaper



Nearly 300 new planet candidates

Whether or not Kepler can resume its planet-hunting activities, scientists will likely continue pulling new alien worlds out of the mission's huge dataset for several years to come.

Indeed, Hunter announced in his mission update that researchers had detected 274 new exoplanet candidates in Kepler's observations thus far, bringing the mission's total haul to 3,548 potential alien worlds. (Just 135 have been confirmed to date, but team members expect at least 90 percent will end up being the real deal.)

"Some of these new planet candidates are small and some reside in the habitable zone of their stars, but much work remains to be done to verify these results," Hunter wrote.

Kepler's prime mission life was pegged at 3.5 years, and the spacecraft has about four years' worth of data under its belt. So it's likely the mission will be able to accomplish its main goal, ultimately determining how commonly "alien Earths" occur around the Milky Way, team members have said.

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-seeks-ideas-ailing-planet-hunting-spacecrafts-mission-113049706.html

Now Geo, by "millions of miles from our planet", they mean aprox 21,000,000, if I'm correctly informed that it's in one of the Earth-Sun Trojans.  The Moon is only about 25,000, and the Hubble's in LEO, isn't it?

[Unorthodox]

Yes, Hubble's in LEO, like 300-400 miles or so. 

A rendevous with Kepler would be a lot more technical than going to the moon.  No free return gravity sling and all. 

Theoretically, we could capture/return it to orbit for repair as a test for asteroid capture.  Not really cost effective to fix it, but finding out exactly what went wrong with the wheels would be beneficial in the long run.

[Buster's Uncle]

Oops; I dropped a zero - the Moon's aprox. 250,000 miles out.  Geosynch's only 7,000 miles further out than the figure I gave.

[Unorthodox]

Hm.  For some reason I thought GPS was in full geostationary orbit. 

[Buster's Uncle]

Huh.  I did, too.  Stands to reason that it would be one less positioning calculation - is geosynch that crowded with communications satellites?

[Unorthodox]

Well, probably cheaper at the 12 hour orbit.  Might be a technological reason too (power of communications in GPS devices?).

[Buster's Uncle]

Less juice needed for broadcast range + less fuel to achieve the orbit at the cost of a fairly simple step added to the positioning calculation?  That could be it - good thinking.