Author Topic: Social Engineering re-work.  (Read 3221 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vonbach

Social Engineering re-work.
« on: October 25, 2015, 04:27:37 AM »
I want to try something different with my social engineering and I was looking for some feedback.

Police State: +2 POLICE +2 SUPPORT -2 GROWTH
Oligarchy: +2 ECON +2 PROBE -1 RESEARCH
Republic: +1 MORALE +2 GROWTH -2 PROBE

Free Market: +2 GROWTH +1 EFFIC -2 PLANET
Planned: +1 SUPPORT +1 INDUSTRY -1 GROWTH
Autarky: +2 GROWTH + 1 INDUSTRY  -1 ECONOMY

Power: +1 SUPPORT +1 MORALE +1 PROBE -1 ECONOMY
Progress: +1 RESEARCH +1 PLANET -2 PROBE
Wealth: +2 ECONOMY +1 INDUSTRY -3 POLICE

Cybernetic: +2 EFFIC +2 PLANET +RESEARCH -3 POLICE
Eudaimonic: +2 GROWTH +2 ECONOMY +2 TALENT -3 MORALE
Thought Control: +2 PROBE +2 INDUSTRY +2 SUPPORT +2POLICE -2 GROWTH (maybe -2 research)

This is what i was thinking of right now.


« Last Edit: October 25, 2015, 05:12:52 AM by vonbach »

Offline vonbach

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2015, 11:52:51 AM »
Anyone have any thoughts as far as balance goes?

Offline Nexii

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2015, 12:23:12 AM »
Probably would end up in Oligarchy/X/Wealth most of the time.  +ECONOMY is very powerful, and not much downsides on each.

Offline vonbach

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2015, 03:20:59 AM »
Thanks for the feedback.
-1 research and -3 police isn't enough for oligarchy and wealth?
What changes would you make to the rest?
Possibly only +1 econ on both wealth and oligarchy?
I was also thinking possibly replacing the industry
with +2 green in autarky.

Offline Nexii

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2015, 04:20:06 AM »
Yea bigger penalties or just +1 ECON

Offline vonbach

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2015, 05:10:18 PM »
Not a bad Idea.

Offline Nevill

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2015, 08:16:29 AM »
A good idea of how powerful/weak the given settings are is to run how many permutations of Politics/Economy/Values are viable with given changes.

Oligarchy is overpowered. -1 Research is not enough of a penalty for +2 ECON.


Republic seems a bit tame in comparison to P. State/Olygarchy, taken by itself.

Progress seems weak, compared to its neighbours.

Police State can't be run with Planned. -3 Growth would kill anyone, unless the plan is to build Children's Creches everywhere. Was the idea to make them a wartime setting for massive SUPPORT? That might be viable.

Republic + Freemarket/Autarky + Creches would make is very easy to popboom. Do you want to preserve this mechanics from the original. I myself prefer the one where one can only popboom through Golden Ages - it is one thing that discourages ICSing (bureaucracy drones make it impossible to have a GA).

Wealth is extremely powerful, with not only +2 ECON, but with a + INDUSTRY as well. Perhaps there can be an industry malus, as it would make the player spend at least some of their money on hurrying. I think though that the game needs a setting with +2 ECON as a way to immediately improve one's financial situation. It's just needs more fine-tuning.

FreeMarket and Autarky share the same ++GROWTH bonus. This makes them too similar. One thing the original did well was to make settings really different. There never were similar bonuses in a given row. Same goes for Autarky and Planned with +INDUSTRY.


For the moment I think making Wealth +1 ECON, changing Oligarchy penalty to -3 RESEARCH (or -2 INDUSTRY, orr something meaningful that can be felt), and changing Autarky Growth/Industry bonus to something else would make for good changes.

And then there is the question of faction bonuses. Those, too, might affect whether or not some settings are viable.

Offline vonbach

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2015, 01:22:19 PM »
I have been tweaking the social engineering a bit.
I'm always playing with it to be honest
Police is - 1 growth though honestly -2 growth is accurate. Police state is intended to a wartime state
or simply a state sacrificing growth for stability.
Oligrachy is +2 Probe +1 Economy -2 research or police
Republic is +2 growth +1 talent -2 probe might go back to +1 morale.
Republic is intended to by a growth/wartime hybrid hence the morale bonus earlier.
+1 Police might also work for it.

Free Market is the same i might go with +1 growth +2 effic
Planned is the same.
Autarky is the one I was putting the most thought into the idea is
a stable state economy at the cost of foreign trade. A closed system.
+2 growth and +1 industry or possibly +1 talent or + planet

Power same
Progress same might increase the planet bonus.
Wealth +1 economy +1 industry -3 morale
wealth has always been powerful to be blunt.
Thanks for the feedback.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2015, 01:46:53 PM by vonbach »

Offline vonbach

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2015, 10:03:18 PM »
Here is what i am working on now.

Police State: +2 Police +2 Support -Growth
Oligarchy: +2 Economy +2Probe -4police
Republic: +2Growth +1 Police -2 Probe

Free Market: +2 Growth +2 Effic -3 Planet
Planned +1 Industry +1 Support -1 Growth
Autarky: +2 planet +1 Talent -1 Support

Power: +1 Morale +2 Support +1 Probe -1 Economy or -2 Planet
Progress: +1 research +1 Effic -2 Probe
Wealth: +1 Economy +Industry -3 Morale. Honestly I'm thinking of scrapping the concept of Wealth all together
and going with something different. Something that makes the population easier to manage at the cost of morale.

Offline Nexii

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2015, 02:56:43 AM »
Wealth was always strange to me too.  Perhaps something like Enlightenment.  +2 EFFIC, +TALENT, -2 MORALE
Progress then might get +RESEARCH, +INDUSTRY, -2 PROBE

Offline Mart

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2015, 12:28:13 PM »
...Honestly I'm thinking of scrapping the concept of Wealth all together
and going with something different. Something that makes the population easier to manage at the cost of morale.
That sounds a bit like "mind control" which is in future society.
To achieve this, one could drug the society into it, hence lack of morale. Yet again, it sounds close to mind control.
this sounds like negative value overall, people with depression are easier to manage and they are low morale. This seems proper when one wants to destroy a society.

Offline vonbach

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2015, 01:19:52 PM »
Police State: +2 POLICE +2 SUPPORT +2 PROBE -3 RESEARCH
Oligarchy: +2 ECON +2 PROBE -1 RESEARCH
Republic: +1 MORALE +2 GROWTH -2 PROBE

Free Market: +2 GROWTH +2 EFFIC -3 PLANET
Planned: +1 SUPPORT +1 INDUSTRY -2 GROWTH
Autarky: +2 EFFIC + 1 TALENT  -1 SUPPORT

Power: +1 SUPPORT +1 MORALE +1 PROBE -1 ECONOMY
Green: +2 PLANET + 2 EFFIC -2 GROWTH
Wealth: +2 ECONOMY  -5 POLICE -3 Morale

Cybernetic: +2 EFFIC +2 PLANET +RESEARCH -3 POLICE
Eudaimonic: +2 GROWTH +2 ECONOMY +2 TALENT -3 MORALE
Thought Control: +2 PROBE +2 INDUSTRY +2 SUPPORT +2POLICE -2 GROWTH

This is what I'm working on now I moved Green to the values and it seems to fit there.
Borrowed some ideas from others here.

Quote
That sounds a bit like "mind control" which is in future society.
To achieve this, one could drug the society into it, hence lack of morale

Yes like a weaker version of the idea pre thought control. That was what I was thinking.
I was thinking of turning planned into something resembling that. Like switching the talent
from autarky to Planned and giving autarky something else.

Offline vonbach

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2015, 01:59:38 AM »
Trying something a bit different. I've been borrowing from some of Mercantile Interests ideas and adapted it for my own.


Police State +2 Police +2Support +2 Probe -2 research
Republic +2 Efficiency +2 Morale -2 police (maybe -1 support)
Feudal +1 economy  +1 police -1 support (maybe -1 growth)

Free market +2 Growth =1 industry -3 planet
planned +1 support +1 talent -2 efficiency
Autarky +2 efficiency +2planet -1 growth (maybe -1 support)

Power +2 support +2 morale +1 probe -1 industry
Progress +2 research -1 growth
Wealth +2 economy -4 police -3 morale (maybe this is a bit harsh)

Cybernetic +2 efficiency +2 research +2 planet -3 police (now available with cyber ethics)
Thought Control +2police +2morale +2 support  +2 industry +2 probe -2 growth (now available with planetary economics)
Eudaemonic +2growth +2 economy +2 talent -3 morale (now available with environmental economics.)

What does everyone think as far as balance?

Offline Nexii

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #13 on: December 21, 2015, 08:16:48 PM »
Planned is a little weak...it needs something that is better past the very early game.  Rest seem fairly balanced. 

Offline vonbach

Re: Social Engineering re-work.
« Reply #14 on: January 01, 2016, 01:59:01 AM »
I gave planned an extra talent some time back. The whole thing seems to work fairly well.

 

* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Select language:

* Community poll

SMAC v.4 SMAX v.2 (or previous versions)
-=-
24 (7%)
XP Compatibility patch
-=-
9 (2%)
Gog version for Windows
-=-
103 (32%)
Scient (unofficial) patch
-=-
40 (12%)
Kyrub's latest patch
-=-
14 (4%)
Yitzi's latest patch
-=-
89 (28%)
AC for Mac
-=-
3 (0%)
AC for Linux
-=-
6 (1%)
Gog version for Mac
-=-
10 (3%)
No patch
-=-
16 (5%)
Total Members Voted: 314
AC2 Wiki Logo
-click pic for wik-

* Random quote

Although Planet's native life is based, like Earth's, on right-handed DNA, and codes for all the same amino acids, the inevitable chemical and structural differences from a billion years of evolution in an alien environment render the native plant life highly poisonous to humans. Juicy, ripe grenade fruits may look appealing, but a mouthful of organonitrates will certainly change your mind in a hurry.
~ Lady Deirdre Skye ‘A Comparative Biology of Planet’

* Select your theme

*
Templates: 5: index (default), PortaMx/Mainindex (default), PortaMx/Frames (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portamx_above, main, portamx_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 4: index+Modifications.english (default), TopicRating/.english (default), PortaMx/PortaMx.english (default), OharaYTEmbed.english (default).
Style sheets: 0: .
Files included: 45 - 1228KB. (show)
Queries used: 41.

[Show Queries]