Author Topic: NASA picks 3 private firms to develop space taxis  (Read 838 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Buster's Uncle

  • With community service, I
  • Ascend
  • *
  • Posts: 49405
  • €99
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • Because there are times when people just need a cute puppy  Soft kitty, warm kitty, little ball of fur  A WONDERFUL concept, Unity - & a 1-way trip that cost 400 trillion & 40 yrs.  
  • AC2 is my instrument, my heart, as I play my song.
  • Planet tales writer Smilie Artist Custom Faction Modder AC2 Wiki contributor Downloads Contributor
    • View Profile
    • My Custom Factions
    • Awards
NASA picks 3 private firms to develop space taxis
« on: August 04, 2012, 05:12:19 PM »
Quote
NASA picks 3 private firms to develop space taxis
By SETH BORENSTEIN | Associated Press – 23 hrs ago.. .


WASHINGTON (AP) — NASA has picked three aerospace companies to build small rocketships to take astronauts to the International Space Station.

This is the third phase of NASA's efforts to get private space companies to take over the job of the now-retired space shuttle. The space agency is giving them more than $1.1 billion.

Once the spaceships are built, NASA plans to hire the private companies to taxi astronauts into space within five years. Until they are ready, NASA is paying Russia to do the job

The three companies are the Boeing Co. of Houston, Space Exploration Technologies, called SpaceX, of Hawthorne, Calif., and Sierra Nevada Corp. of Louisville, Colo.

NASA's commercial crew development program started with seven commercial companies.
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-picks-3-private-firms-develop-space-taxis-192925793--finance.html

Offline Unorthodox

Re: NASA picks 3 private firms to develop space taxis
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2012, 05:31:07 AM »
Of those, the SpaceX capsule is by FAR the furthest along, ya know, since it's already been UP THERE and all.  They just have some safety testing of the crew portion/option on the capsule now. 

I frankly don't see the Sierra Nevada one getting off the ground for a while. 

Boeing has had theirs in developement for a LONG time, on a different contract, but haven't done any real flight testing yet, due to that other contract.  It should be ready to go for some flight tests in a hurry, but I openly question using the Atlas 5 which will need some rather serious modifications to bring it human-safe levels of acceleration, and it hasn't exactly had the best reliability history as it is. 

 

* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?


Login with username, password and session length

Select language:

* Community poll

SMAC v.4 SMAX v.2 (or previous versions)
-=-
24 (7%)
XP Compatibility patch
-=-
9 (2%)
Gog version for Windows
-=-
103 (32%)
Scient (unofficial) patch
-=-
40 (12%)
Kyrub's latest patch
-=-
14 (4%)
Yitzi's latest patch
-=-
89 (28%)
AC for Mac
-=-
3 (0%)
AC for Linux
-=-
6 (1%)
Gog version for Mac
-=-
10 (3%)
No patch
-=-
16 (5%)
Total Members Voted: 314
AC2 Wiki Logo
-click pic for wik-

* Random quote

We shall take only the greatest minds, the finest soldiers, the most faithful servants. We shall multiply them a thousandfold and release them to usher in a new era of glory.
~Col. Corazon Santiago 'The Council of War'

* Select your theme

*
Templates: 5: index (default), PortaMx/Mainindex (default), PortaMx/Frames (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portamx_above, main, portamx_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 4: index+Modifications.english (default), TopicRating/.english (default), PortaMx/PortaMx.english (default), OharaYTEmbed.english (default).
Style sheets: 0: .
Files included: 45 - 1228KB. (show)
Queries used: 38.

[Show Queries]