Author Topic: NASA Plans to Have WFIRST Space Telescope Reviews Complete by April  (Read 308 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Buster's Uncle

  • With community service, I
  • Ascend
  • *
  • Posts: 49473
  • €263
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • Because there are times when people just need a cute puppy  Soft kitty, warm kitty, little ball of fur  A WONDERFUL concept, Unity - & a 1-way trip that cost 400 trillion & 40 yrs.  
  • AC2 is my instrument, my heart, as I play my song.
  • Planet tales writer Smilie Artist Custom Faction Modder AC2 Wiki contributor Downloads Contributor
    • View Profile
    • My Custom Factions
    • Awards
NASA Plans to Have WFIRST Space Telescope Reviews Complete by April
Space.com
By Jeff Foust, SpaceNews Writer |  January 9, 2018 12:04pm ET



NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — NASA hopes to have a major astronomy mission back on track by April after completing efforts to reduce its cost, an agency official said Jan. 8.

Speaking at a meeting of astronomers prior to the start of the 231st Meeting of the American Astronomical Society here, Paul Hertz, director of NASA's astrophysics division, said the agency plans to hold a key review for the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST), known as Key Decision Point B, by April.

WFIRST was the subject of an independent analysis that concluded in October that its cost was at least $3.6 billion. NASA, in response to that report, called on the project to "descope" the mission to bring its cost down to a prior of estimate of $3.2 billion.

Hertz said that, under the project's current schedule, there will be a system requirements review and mission design review in February, followed by an independent cost assessment. That will be followed by the Key Decision Point B review in March or April, which would allow the project to proceed into Phase B of its development.



Changes to the WFIRST mission to reduce its cost have focused on its instruments, including a coronagraph that will now be considered a technology demonstration with funding contributions from NASA's space technology arm.  Credit: NASA

 
The biggest changes to WFIRST to lower its cost involve one of its instruments, a coronagraph. That instrument is designed to precisely block light from individual stars, allowing observations of planets or dust disks orbiting them.

That instrument, he said, will now be considered a technology demonstration, and its cost will be shared with the agency's Space Technology Mission Directorate. "Their contribution, and international contributions, do not count against the $3.2 billion," he said.

As a technology demonstration, Hertz said the coronagraph will have fewer science functions. It will, he said, remain "a very valuable technology demonstration with feed forward into future direct imaging missions."

The mission is also planning reductions for WFIRST's other main instrument, a wide-field instrument. Hertz said the instrument will have fewer operating modes and relaxed detector requirements, and some capabilities will be provided by unannounced international partners.

Another change has been revisions to the overall project schedule, which allows for a launch about six months sooner than previously planned, saving money. However, he said the project will spend more money on "mission assurance" activities in response to a finding by last fall's independent review that argued the mission was taking on a higher risk profile than warranted for one of this size.

Hertz said later that NASA is in discussions with five potential international partners for roles on WFIRST. "Each of those partners is going through their own internal processes, so we're not announcing what we're assuming they will contribute until they're ready to say publicly that they have approval," he said.


https://www.space.com/39330-nasa-wfirst-space-telescope-reviews-april-2018.html

 

* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Select language:

* Community poll

SMAC v.4 SMAX v.2 (or previous versions)
-=-
24 (7%)
XP Compatibility patch
-=-
9 (2%)
Gog version for Windows
-=-
103 (32%)
Scient (unofficial) patch
-=-
40 (12%)
Kyrub's latest patch
-=-
14 (4%)
Yitzi's latest patch
-=-
89 (28%)
AC for Mac
-=-
3 (0%)
AC for Linux
-=-
6 (1%)
Gog version for Mac
-=-
10 (3%)
No patch
-=-
16 (5%)
Total Members Voted: 314
AC2 Wiki Logo
-click pic for wik-

* Random quote

And so we return again to the holy void. Some say this is simply our destiny, but I would have you remember always that the void EXISTS, just as surely as you or I. Is nothingness any less a miracle than substance?
~Sister Miriam Godwinson 'We must Dissent'

* Select your theme

*
Templates: 5: index (default), PortaMx/Mainindex (default), PortaMx/Frames (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 8: init, html_above, body_above, portamx_above, main, portamx_below, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 4: index+Modifications.english (default), TopicRating/.english (default), PortaMx/PortaMx.english (default), OharaYTEmbed.english (default).
Style sheets: 0: .
Files included: 45 - 1228KB. (show)
Queries used: 36.

[Show Queries]