Author Topic: This day in tech: Deep Blue defeats Garry Kasparov 1st time - February 10,1996  (Read 881 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sisko

  • Emissary AND Founder
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2972
  • €1733
  • View Inventory
  • Send /Gift
  • Try to steal credits from another member!  Try to steal credits from another member!  Try to steal credits from another member!  Try to steal credits from another member!  
  • This place is yours, not mine.
  • Scenario Creator Downloads Contributor
    • View Profile
    • Alpha Centauri 2
    • Awards


On February 10, 1996, Deep Blue became the first machine to win a chess game against a reigning world champion (Garry Kasparov) under regular time controls. However, Kasparov won three and drew two of the following five games, beating Deep Blue by a score of 4?2 (wins count 1 point, draws count ? point). The match concluded on February 17, 1996.
Deep Blue was then heavily upgraded (unofficially nicknamed "Deeper Blue") and played Kasparov again in May 1997, winning the six-game rematch 3??2?, ending on May 11. Deep Blue won the deciding game six after Kasparov made a mistake in the opening, becoming the first computer system to defeat a reigning world champion in a match under standard chess tournament time controls.
The system derived its playing strength mainly out of brute force computing power. It was a massively parallel, RS/6000 SP Thin P2SC-based system with 30-nodes, with each node containing a 120 MHz P2SC microprocessor for a total of 30, enhanced with 480 special purpose VLSI chess chips. Its chess playing program was written in C and ran under the AIX operating system. It was capable of evaluating 200 million positions per second, twice as fast as the 1996 version. In June 1997, Deep Blue was the 259th most powerful supercomputer according to the TOP500 list, achieving 11.38 GFLOPS on the High-Performance LINPACK benchmark.
The Deep Blue chess computer which defeated Kasparov in 1997 would typically search to a depth of between six and eight moves to a maximum of twenty or even more moves in some situations. Levy and Newborn estimate that one additional ply (half-move) increases the playing strength 50 to 70 Elo points (Levy & Newborn 1991:192).
Deep Blue's evaluation function was initially written in a generalized form, with many to-be-determined parameters (e.g. how important is a safe king position compared to a space advantage in the center, etc.). The optimal values for these parameters were then determined by the system itself, by analyzing thousands of master games. The evaluation function had been split into 8,000 parts, many of them designed for special positions. In the opening book there were over 4,000 positions and 700,000 grandmaster games. The endgame database contained many six piece endgames and five or fewer piece positions. Before the second match, the chess knowledge of the program was fine tuned by grandmaster Joel Benjamin. The opening library was provided by grandmasters Miguel Illescas, John Fedorowicz, and Nick de Firmian. When Kasparov requested that he be allowed to study other games that Deep Blue had played so as to better understand his opponent, IBM refused. However, Kasparov did study many popular PC computer games to become familiar with computer game play in general.

The move-by-move details of the game are described here
Source: Wikipedia
« Last Edit: February 10, 2011, 11:01:35 AM by sisko »
Anyone else feels like it's time to fix the faction graphics bug?

 

* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?


Login with username, password and session length

Select language:

* Community poll

SMAC v.4 SMAX v.2 (or previous versions)
-=-
14 (6%)
XP Compatibility patch
-=-
7 (3%)
Gog version for Windows
-=-
45 (22%)
Scient (unofficial) patch
-=-
22 (10%)
Kyrub's latest patch
-=-
13 (6%)
Yitzi's latest patch
-=-
77 (38%)
AC for Mac
-=-
2 (0%)
AC for Linux
-=-
5 (2%)
Gog version for Mac
-=-
7 (3%)
No patch
-=-
9 (4%)
Total Members Voted: 201
AC2 Wiki Logo

* Random quote

Men in their arrogance claim to understand the nature of creation, and devise elaborate theories to describe its behavior. But always they discover in the end that God was quite a bit more clever than they thought.
~Sister Miriam Godwinson 'We must Dissent'

* Select your theme

*

Facebook Comments