Author Topic: The TOTPP (Read 821 times)

bvanevery · « **Reply #15 on:** January 16, 2019, 02:31:30 AM »

Yes, I am arguing that SMAC is a superior gaming system to TOT. There's simply more to do in SMAC. Other things are equal: community is the same size. I'm surprised it's the same size, it says to me that we could be doing more somehow. Or else there's some phenomenon of long term popularity, like Civ II got more exposure back in the day. Or that many people actually like a simpler, cut down game as they get older. Or a fair number of people really care about faceplates and don't really care about gameplay.

Quote from: Elok on January 15, 2019, 08:58:46 PM

I never saw the point in Dungeons & Dragons, but I get that a lot of people enjoy rolling dice around and doing math to figure out if their sword hit the orc or not.

For the present discussion, that's apples and oranges. AD&D is about having a Dungeon Master, a person who can adjudicate the game with arbitrary creativity and content. AD&D is a rules heavy system as RPGs go. If you wanted to compare AD&D to GURPS to "no rules" freeform PBEM RPG, to be honest I don't think it sheds any light on SMAC vs. Civ II.

I think comparing either to the Civ IV modding community would be instructive. I've never studied it up, simply because I like SMAC better than Civ IV. But I have no doubt that Civ IV modding likely dwarfs my effort, or this TOT effort.

Buster's Uncle · « **Reply #16 on:** January 16, 2019, 02:58:27 AM »

b-

Enough. This is not really on-topic for the thread, and Elok doesn't seem interested.

This is Other Games - people are allowed to like other games in this folder w/o a disclaimer admitting SMACX is better.

bvanevery · « **Reply #17 on:** January 16, 2019, 05:03:57 AM »

Well have fun as usual then. I can't talk to y'all about anything I actually think. Unsubscribing, and I'll remember to stay away from anything on this site that isn't SMAC proper. Even then...

For Pete's sake if I can't make a direct comparison to Civ II, the game that SMAC is based on...

Elok · « **Reply #18 on:** January 16, 2019, 11:19:03 AM »

Right. Honestly, BUncle, I kinda wish there were some better way to get the word out, even if I'm past the stage in life where I can spend hours tweaking A/D/M values.

Unorthodox · « **Reply #19 on:** January 29, 2019, 07:02:30 PM »

So I never played ToT.

In fact, I barely played Civ II.

We had a used Macintosh to get hEt through college, and didn't get a PC until 2000 or so. While I BOUGHT Civ II, (and in fact seeing it at a friends' played a part in me wanting a PC at all) I didn't really jump into the series deeply until III.

My issue with II (only played vanilla), and really with SMACX as well, is the support system for units. I really, really loathe the support system.

Does this modify that at all?

Elok · « **Reply #20 on:** August 17, 2019, 04:14:46 PM »

Holy cow I just saw this. In theory you should be able to mod the support system using the Lua script. I haven't dug around in the library, or even looked into it at all closely, because I'm not silly enough to think I'll have time to really play with this. Pyrebound is my sandbox, these days.
EDIT: I just reviewed CFC's Lua listing ( https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/totpp-lua-function-reference.557527/ ), and it appears support is not something you can easily mod. But it's a big list and I didn't dig very thoroughly. I agree that the support system is rather silly.

DrazharLn · « **Reply #21 on:** September 12, 2019, 09:50:30 PM »

What an interesting project! I wonder if multiplayer works with any of these mods...

Elok · « **Reply #22 on:** September 22, 2019, 01:10:48 AM »

I imagine it would, yes.

News:

Author Topic: The TOTPP (Read 821 times)

bvanevery

Re: The TOTPP

Buster's Uncle

Re: The TOTPP

bvanevery

Re: The TOTPP

Elok

Re: The TOTPP

Unorthodox

Re: The TOTPP

Elok

Re: The TOTPP

DrazharLn

Re: The TOTPP

Elok

Re: The TOTPP

User

Graphics patch

.exe patches

Community poll

Random quote

Select your theme