QuoteFox News Unleashes Angry Anchors on ‘Totally Out of Control’ Donald [Sleezebag]https://www.yahoo.com/tv/s/fox-news-unleashes-angry-anchors-totally-control-donald-163519555.html (https://www.yahoo.com/tv/s/fox-news-unleashes-angry-anchors-totally-control-donald-163519555.html)
The Wrap
Jordan Chariton August 25, 2015
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/J0BTVnIk8GNvLYPMiUG3Og--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9NjE4O2g9NDA4/http://media.zenfs.com/en_US/News/TheWrap/Fox_News_Unleashes_Angry_Anchors-a8d5a507e6dce1836146008cffb07ad0)
Fox News Channel unleashed its anchors on Tuesday to fight back against Donald [Sleezebag]’s renewed criticisms of star anchor Megyn Kelly.
“He is totally out of bounds reigniting that fight,” Fox & Friends host Brian Kilmeade said on Tuesday’s show.”I don’t know if he expects to get ratings out of that, or poll numbers, but he’s not going to be successful. “You can not, you should not, keep going after her.”
Kilmeade also called [Sleezebag] “totally out of control” (probably a comment that won’t help keep [Sleezebag] as a regular phone guest on the morning show).
Sean Hannity, Geraldo Rivera, Bret Baier, Bill Hemmer and Dana Perino took to Twitter to directly and indirectly tell [Sleezebag] to cool it with the Kelly attacks.
[Sleezebag] live-tweeted during “The Kelly File” on Monday night, criticizing the Fox star, who had just returned from vacation. He also retweeted tweets that called her a “bimbo.”
The [Sleezebag]–Fox News feud begun after [Sleezebag] went off on Kelly following the network’s GOP presidential debate, calling her questions unfair and suggesting she was menstruating during the debate.
The anchors’ breaking their silence is the first of what’s likely to be a strong, coordinates response from Fox News and network chairman Roger Ailes.
The network hasn’t yet formally made a statement on [Sleezebag]’s renewed attacks on Kelly.
---
See the link for a bunch of tweets that are too much trouble to copy (and format badly in quotes).
Suppose FOX decided to ignore him. Even going as far to list him in their poll questions as "other".
Do you think he could win the Republican nomination?
They sure have a lot of say over what that particular corner of the group mind is thinking...
QuoteGeraldo Rivera
uh oh. they pulling out the big guns.
"Any Press is Good Press."
I think this defines the [Sleezebag] campaign to date. AND IT SEEMS TO BE WORKING. You are going to have to nail him down on WHAT, exactly, he plans to DO. Build a wall, make jobs, etc etc etc. Yeah, how you gonna do that? How you going to handle foreign affairs when you can't even hold a diplomatic conversation with anyone who disagrees with you?
Nail him down on those, he seems to be immune to the character flaws. In fact, they seem to be STRENGTHS to the general public.
And, like it or not, he is DOMINATING the news cycle. Totally annihilating everyone else. Can't learn a damn thing about anyone other than what they said about [Sleezebag].
This continues, he wins. Hands down.
When did character flaws become a strength? What level of degeneracy has this country reached? ???
I think it's the consequences of the perpetual PR campaign, blame game and gridlock.
Democrats <----> Republicans
President <----> Congress
There's a large part of the public that has become anti-politician as a result.
So anything that [Sleezebag] says that I would describe as a gaff, others consider proof that [Sleezebag] is speaking from the heart, and not reciting focus-group tested sound bytes or weasel-lawyer evasions as a professional politician would.
QuoteSuppose FOX decided to ignore him. Even going as far to list him in their poll questions as "other".
Do you think he could win the Republican nomination?
If they try to ignore him they lose he wins. The other candidates are a joke and everyone knows it.
Jeb Bush might as well be running for Mexican presidency and he has all the Bush family legacy besides.
The reason that [Sleezebag] is hammering everyone flat is the people of this country are sick to death of
our country becoming a third world country while were expected to pay for it. We have politicians that
don't act in our interests and expect us to pay for our own destruction besides. Oh and if we object to
being demographically replaced were racists.The media lies to our face and expects us to believe them.
What do these people expect? Someone like [Sleezebag] was inevitable.QuoteHow you going to handle foreign affairs when you can't even hold a diplomatic conversation with anyone who disagrees with you?
This is 90 % of his popularity. The more the media bully, whine and play their stupid little the stronger he gets.
Because he isn't scared of them and doesn't apologize to them. The more he does this the more powerful he gets.
This is 90 % of his popularity. The more the media bully, whine and play their stupid little the stronger he gets.
Because he isn't scared of them and doesn't apologize to them. The more he does this the more powerful he gets.
I agree. I'm not asking the media to care about what they say to THEM. How is he going to negotiate with Mexico or China. Neither of which he's not exactly building bridges with, and both of which are rather key partners. This might be too nebulous a concept for the general public, though.
Still, polls are one thing, but people who actually vote take it seriously -for whatever reason- unlike stupid polls.
That thing Mitt Romney got in trouble for saying last time about how 47% of the voters were automatically going to vote against him? Not hard to see how that could be taken badly, but he kinda got deaned on that one - 'cause he was right. Precious few voted for the monkey, a man with few real positives, considerable negatives, and good name recognition in the 2000 election - but almost half voted against Al Gore, who campaigns with all the seeming integrity of a hooker desperate to raise money for the next fix of heroine. Nobody won that election, but, of two very weak candidates, Gore lost it.
I just can't believe -and you guys aren't wrong about the public perception that the media sucks, which is there because it's true- that antagonizing the information gatekeepers to the degree the Pig has isn't going to bite him on the butt. Repeat: it's the people who decide what information to pass to the public he's making enemies of. Reagan and people following in his style limited themselves to a little carping and slander about bias - this is going to play out differently over time, mark my words.
Repeat: it's the people who decide what information to pass to the public he's making enemies of.Kind of. It's the PEOPLE who decide which media to watch, and a failure to produce what they WANT will swiftly result in no jobs, though.
They HAVE to cover [Sleezebag] bacause the people have spoken. And, they can't just spin it all negative because it'll just make a bigger case FOR [Sleezebag].
Long term, yeah, they can potentially ween people off onto "real" candidates, but they need a little help from said candidates to make themselves interesting.
Either the public gets bored with [Sleezebag]'s sideshow act, or someone else steps up. That's our options.
I think I have an answer.You left out Morton Downey Jr.
Rush and his rants validated people. Ratings followed. When callers say "Ditto" it doesn't mean that they agree with everything he just said, it's actually a reference to a caller many years ago who gushed about how validated Rush made her feel.
Roger Ailes and then Murdoch saw a way to turn those ratings into networks.
So first the people flock, and then the outlets appear.
If they come, build it.
http://www.naturalnews.com/039752_mass_shootings_psychiatric_drugs_antidepressants.html
(NaturalNews) The following is a republishing of an important article written by Dan Roberts from AmmoLand.com. It reveals the real truth about mass shootings that bureaucrats and lawmakers are choosing to sweep under the rug: psychiatric drugs. If you want to know the real reason why mass shootings are taking place, this is the "inconvenient truth" the media won't cover.
http://www.sott.net/article/279716-Nearly-every-mass-shooting-in-the-last-20-years-shares-one-thing-in-common-and-it-isnt-weapons
Multiple credible scientific studies going back more then a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior. One need only Google relevant key words or phrases to see for themselves. www.ssristories.com (http://www.ssristories.com) is one popular site that has documented over 4500 " Mainstream Media " reported cases from around the World of aberrant or violent behavior by those taking these powerful drugs...
...On to the list of mass shooters and the stark link to psychotropic drugs:
Eric Harris, age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold, aged 18 (Columbine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold's medical records have never been made available to the public.
Jeff Weise, age 16, had been prescribed 60 mg/day of Prozac (three times the average starting dose for adults!) when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather's girlfriend and many fellow students at Red Lake, Minnesota. He then shot himself. 10 dead, 12 wounded.
Cory Baadsgaard, age 16, Wahluke (Washington state) High School, was on Paxil (which caused him to have hallucinations) when he took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of the event.
Chris Fetters, age 13, killed his favorite aunt while taking Prozac.
Christopher Pittman, age 12, murdered both his grandparents while taking Zoloft.
Mathew Miller, age 13, hanged himself in his bedroom closet after taking Zoloft for 6 days.
Kip Kinkel, age 15, (on Prozac and Ritalin) shot his parents while they slept then went to school and opened fire killing 2 classmates and injuring 22 shortly after beginning Prozac treatment.
Luke Woodham, age 16 (Prozac) killed his mother and then killed two students, wounding six others.
A boy in Pocatello, ID (Zoloft) in 1998 had a Zoloft-induced seizure that caused an armed stand off at his school.
Michael Carneal (Ritalin), age 14, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded..
A young man in Huntsville, Alabama (Ritalin) went psychotic chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.
Andrew Golden, age 11, (Ritalin) and Mitchell Johnson, aged 14, (Ritalin) shot 15 people, killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others.
TJ Solomon, age 15, (Ritalin) high school student in Conyers, Georgia opened fire on and wounded six of his class mates.
Rod Mathews, age 14, (Ritalin) beat a classmate to death with a bat.
James Wilson, age 19, (various psychiatric drugs) from Breenwood, South Carolina, took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers.
Elizabeth Bush, age 13, (Paxil) was responsible for a school shooting in Pennsylvania.
Jason Hoffman (Effexor and Celexa) - school shooting in El Cajon, California.
Jarred Viktor, age 15, (Paxil), after five days on Paxil he stabbed his grandmother 61 times.
http://ssristories.org/ssris/
Other side effects
Side effects which are less common, but not rare, include:Quotean increase in violent thoughts and impulses, suicidal ideation, mania, loss of judgment, strange or terrifying dreams, reduced inhibition, craving for alcohol, a tendency to indulge in reckless behavior, thought disturbance or full-blown psychosis, and increased propensity to drug and alcohol addiction.
Psychotropic drugs, including SSRIs, when taken for a long time, predispose people to other addictions. This is particularly true with children who are started on these drugs at a young age and become bipolar in adolescence as a consequence. Although pharmaceutical companies have denied it for years, SSRIs and other psychotropic drugs create dependency. When people get hooked on street drugs, we call it addiction and disapprove. When people get hooked on drugs prescribed by their doctors, and suffer terrible symptoms when they try to stop taking them, it is interpreted as evidence that they have a chronic illness. Their withdrawal symptoms are mischaracterized as “relapse” and proof that they need the drug to stay well.
Most alarming of all, antidepressants can cause depression and suicidality. Despite having been forced to issue black box warnings in the USA, several manufacturers fudge this one. For example, the Celexa, June, 2012 monograph cautions that:
“Depression is associated with an increased risk of suicidal thoughts, self-harm and suicide (suicide-related events). This risk persists until significant remission occurs. As improvement may not occur during the first few weeks or more of treatment, patients should be closely monitored until such improvement occurs. It is general clinical experience that the risk of suicide may increase in the early stages of recovery.”
In other words, Lundbeck is implying that Celexa makes people feel better, but until this positive effect kicks in, their depression may cause suicidality. According to their spin, it is not the drug but depression that is the problem. However, there is unequivocal evidence [1] that SSRI drugs can cause people who were never depressed and never had a suicidal thought, to become suicidal after taking these medications. People need to understand this, especially parents whose teenagers are among the many thousands whose GPs are offering them SSRIs to help them deal with boyfriend or exam problems.
Similarly, SSRIs cause people to become violent. Studies show that the SSRI & SNRI antidepressants are among the worst drugs for causing violence (see Trends and Data).
Long-term use of antidepressants causes permanent changes to people’s mood and reactions. Suicide and violence are the most alarming side effects, however small the percent of affected persons may be. However, depression and bi-polar, which are more common, are the most offensive side effects. People take these drugs in the belief and hope that the medication will make them feel better, only to have their long term mental health undermined by this decision. It seems that, despite books like Anatomy of an Epidemic few physicians are aware of this. Robert Whitaker pointed this out in his 2010 book, and more recently Danish internist Peter Gotzsche bluntly stated:
“Bipolar illness rose 35-fold in 20 years in the United States. It’s not only the loose criteria (for diagnosis) that cause this disaster; both SSRIs and ADHD drugs cause bipolar illness…WHO studies have shown that patients fare much better in areas of the world where psychotropic drugs are little used…People may get terrible symptoms when they try to stop (taking the drugs), both symptoms that resemble the disease and may others that they have never experienced before.”[2]
[1] Emergence of antidepressant induced suicidality, David Healy, Primary Care Psychiatry, 2000 6:23–28 © LibraPharm Limited
[2] Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime, Psychiatry, the Drug Industry’s Paradise, Dr Peter Gotzsche, Radclofee Publishing, 2013, P196, P199
Trends and data
In 2011, the American National Department of Health and Human Services found that eleven percent of Americans aged 12 years and over were taking antidepressant medication. They found that more than 60% of Americans taking antidepressant medication had been taking it for 2 years or longer, with 14% having taken the medication for 10 years or more. The most astounding finding was that between the time periods 1988–1994 and 2005–2008 – that is, within less than 10 years – the rate of antidepressant use in the United States among all age groups increased nearly 400%.
In the E.U., antidepressant use has also experienced huge growth since the turn of the century.
In 1955, in the USA, approximately one in 13,000 people was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and those who were diagnosed had a 50% chance of recovering without relapse. In 1985, researchers found that in Switzerland, the incidence of bipolar disorder had significantly increased since the introduction of antidepressants. More recently, a meta-analysis of 35 studies involving randomized control trials found that 12.5 % of subjects treated with antidepressants experienced some form of mania. In 2013, the American National Institute of Mental Health warns that: “Bipolar disorder affects approximately 5.7 million American adults, or about 2.6 percent of the U.S. population age 18 and older in a given year.”
Note: Specific reference sources are not listed here. Please contact us if you would like to know the source of any of the information cited above.
PLOS 2010 study on drugs and biolence
On December 15, 2010, PLoS Medicine released a study which showed that, in regard to prescription medications associated with reports of violence towards others, the FDA had received the most reports of violence from the SSRI & SNRI antidepressants (except for Chantix, the smoking cessation drug.) The study listed Prozac as the number 2 drug for violence, and Paxil as number 3.
Antidepressants have been recognized as potential inducers of mania and psychosis since their introduction in the 1950s. Klein and Fink (1) described psychosis as an adverse effect of the older tricyclic antidepressant imipramine. Since the introduction of Prozac in December, 1987, there has been a massive increase in the number of people taking antidepressants. Preda and Bowers 2 reported that over 200,000 people a year in the U.S. enter a hospital with antidepressant-associated mania and/or psychosis. The subsequent harm from this prescribing can be seen in these 5000+ stories.
According to an August, 2013 New York Times article, “fully 1 in 5 Americans take at least one psychiatric medication.”
An absence of controlled scientific evidence
In the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Volume 14, Number 1, Spring 2009, there is a journal article by Joel M. Kauffman, Ph.D., which is titled: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Drugs: More Risk Than Benefits?” In reference to SSRIStories.com, Dr. Kaufmann made the following statement: “Since no clinical trial involving multiple homicides is ever likely to be run, no firmer evidence is likely to be found. Dr. David Healy noted that much of the evidence for suicide and murder came from the efforts of journalists and lawyers.
To read the full article go to the Links page on this site (click the button at the bottom of this page).
A public health problem of epidemic proportions
There is a grave concern among advocates that adverse reactions are greatly underestimated by the public, the medical profession, and the regulatory authorities. Each of these stories in our list can be interpreted as an adverse reaction and in most cases we have highlighted the portion of the article that refers to evidence of bizarre behavioral change consistent with drug reaction. In some stories causation is acknowledged and the juxtaposition of these stories with those where it goes unrecognized as well as the repetition of themes and circumstances is chilling. If indeed medications played a significant role in all these tragedies, then this is a public health problem of epidemic proportions on a global scale.
1 Klein DF, Fink M. Psychiatric Reaction Patterns to Imipramine. Am Journal Psychiatry 1962; 119: 432-438.
2 Preda and Bowers. Antidepressant-Associated Mania and Psychosis Resulting in Psychiatric Admissions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2001: 62: 30-333 National Institute of Mental Health: Health Magazine 2010.
4Thomas J. Moore, Joseph Glenmullen, Curt D. Furberg. Prescription Drugs Associated With Reports of Violence Toward Others. PLoS Medicine: December 15, 2010.
Since we're on a media tangent...
The dominant story today is about a former tv reporter who went Go Pro/social media to kill the former coworkers whom he held responsible for getting him fired, while they were interviewing somebody on tv.
It is unclear whose initials he is referring to. He continues, “As for Dylann Roof? You (deleted)! You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …(deleted)!!!”
...This is not a profitable line of discussion...QuoteSince we're on a media tangent...
The dominant story today is about a former tv reporter who went Go Pro/social media to kill the former coworkers whom he held responsible for getting him fired, while they were interviewing somebody on tv.QuoteIt is unclear whose initials he is referring to. He continues, “As for Dylann Roof? You (deleted)! You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …(deleted)!!!”
A gay Black man says he wants to start a race war. Interesting, theres been one going on for years.
Its just that whites haven't been fighting back. The media almost never reports stories where blacks
kill whites its called "hush crime." This case seems to be the exception.
...This is not a profitable line of discussion...
We have an entire generation of blacks that [possesses a trait other than black skin]...
Good idea, Rusty. Shall I split, or would you like to just start a thread and we take it from here?
[Sleezebag] wins backing of former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan-wins-backing-of-former-grand-wizard-of-the-Ku-Klux-Klan.html]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11824412/[Sleezebag]-wins-backing-of-former-grand-wizard-of-the-Ku-Klux-Klan.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11824412/[Sleezebag)
David Duke endorses Donald [Sleezebag] and praises his stand on immigration
The Telegraph
By David Millward, US Correspondent 12:11AM BST 26 Aug 2015
(http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03046/David-Duke_3046567b.jpg)
David Duke Photo: AP
Donald [Sleezebag]’s campaign to win the Republican nomination for the 2016 presidential election has been endorsed by David Duke, the former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.
The billionaire’s outspoken remarks on immigration have already alarmed the Republican establishment and the public backing offered by Mr Duke, is likely to cause further embarrassment to Mr [Sleezebag] and the party as a whole.
Mr Duke hosts a website which is blatantly anti-Semitic, railing against “Jewish terrorism against Arabs”, “Jewish interests” and “The real Jewish Role in the Crucifixion”.
There is no suggestion that Mr [Sleezebag] shares in any way these views,
Separately, Mr [Sleezebag] has angered many with his description of Mexican immigrants as drug runners, criminals and racists.
Speaking on his own radio show, Mr Duke said Mr [Sleezebag] "understands the real sentiment of America" and praised the billionaire mogul and reality show TV host for "talking about the immigration issue."
"He has really said some incredibly great things recently.
"I really like the fact that he's speaking out on this greatest immediate threat to the American people."
Mr Duke’s endorsement was less than wholehearted, however.
“Although we can’t trust him to do what he says, the other Republican candidates won’t even say what he says.
"So he’s certainly the best of the lot. And he’s certainly somebody that we should get behind in terms ... raising the image of this thing”
Gee their calling [Sleezebag] a racist I didn't see that one coming lol.He wouldn't be the first to capitalize on the racist vote.
Watch his poll numbers go up now.
He wouldn't be the first to capitalize on the racist vote.
Factually *made up* phrases struck.QuoteHe wouldn't be the first to capitalize on the racist vote.Racist simply means white person.Besides thats not why his poll numbers will grow.
People are so sick of the media and the way politicians and celebrities grovel to apologize
any time they are attacked. So the more [Sleezebag] stand his ground gets attacked the more support he gets.Basically this the political pendulum swinging the other waylike people on the right have been
expecting for 40 years.
Racist simply means white person.
Basically this the political pendulum swinging the other wayThe USA is essentially Weimar Germany look at the backlash that happened there.
Just google it it even made that trash rag the huffington post.
This has been known for years. They even finally started putting
warning labels on them.Quotehttp://www.sott.net/article/279716-Nearly-every-mass-shooting-in-the-last-20-years-shares-one-thing-in-common-and-it-isnt-weaponsQuoteMultiple credible scientific studies going back more then a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior. One need only Google relevant key words or phrases to see for themselves. www.ssristories.com (http://www.ssristories.com) is one popular site that has documented over 4500 " Mainstream Media " reported cases from around the World of aberrant or violent behavior by those taking these powerful drugs...
...On to the list of mass shooters and the stark link to psychotropic drugs:QuoteEric Harris, age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold, aged 18 (Columbine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold's medical records have never been made available to the public.
Jeff Weise, age 16, had been prescribed 60 mg/day of Prozac (three times the average starting dose for adults!) when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather's girlfriend and many fellow students at Red Lake, Minnesota. He then shot himself. 10 dead, 12 wounded.
Cory Baadsgaard, age 16, Wahluke (Washington state) High School, was on Paxil (which caused him to have hallucinations) when he took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of the event.
Chris Fetters, age 13, killed his favorite aunt while taking Prozac.
Christopher Pittman, age 12, murdered both his grandparents while taking Zoloft.
Mathew Miller, age 13, hanged himself in his bedroom closet after taking Zoloft for 6 days.
Kip Kinkel, age 15, (on Prozac and Ritalin) shot his parents while they slept then went to school and opened fire killing 2 classmates and injuring 22 shortly after beginning Prozac treatment.
Luke Woodham, age 16 (Prozac) killed his mother and then killed two students, wounding six others.
A boy in Pocatello, ID (Zoloft) in 1998 had a Zoloft-induced seizure that caused an armed stand off at his school.
Michael Carneal (Ritalin), age 14, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded..
A young man in Huntsville, Alabama (Ritalin) went psychotic chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.
Andrew Golden, age 11, (Ritalin) and Mitchell Johnson, aged 14, (Ritalin) shot 15 people, killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others.
TJ Solomon, age 15, (Ritalin) high school student in Conyers, Georgia opened fire on and wounded six of his class mates.
Rod Mathews, age 14, (Ritalin) beat a classmate to death with a bat.
James Wilson, age 19, (various psychiatric drugs) from Breenwood, South Carolina, took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers.
Elizabeth Bush, age 13, (Paxil) was responsible for a school shooting in Pennsylvania.
Jason Hoffman (Effexor and Celexa) - school shooting in El Cajon, California.
Jarred Viktor, age 15, (Paxil), after five days on Paxil he stabbed his grandmother 61 times.
Just google it it even made that trash rag the huffington post.
This has been known for years. They even finally started putting
warning labels on them.Quotehttp://www.sott.net/article/279716-Nearly-every-mass-shooting-in-the-last-20-years-shares-one-thing-in-common-and-it-isnt-weaponsQuoteMultiple credible scientific studies going back more then a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior. One need only Google relevant key words or phrases to see for themselves. www.ssristories.com (http://www.ssristories.com) is one popular site that has documented over 4500 " Mainstream Media " reported cases from around the World of aberrant or violent behavior by those taking these powerful drugs...
...On to the list of mass shooters and the stark link to psychotropic drugs:QuoteEric Harris, age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold, aged 18 (Columbine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold's medical records have never been made available to the public.
Jeff Weise, age 16, had been prescribed 60 mg/day of Prozac (three times the average starting dose for adults!) when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather's girlfriend and many fellow students at Red Lake, Minnesota. He then shot himself. 10 dead, 12 wounded.
Cory Baadsgaard, age 16, Wahluke (Washington state) High School, was on Paxil (which caused him to have hallucinations) when he took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of the event.
Chris Fetters, age 13, killed his favorite aunt while taking Prozac.
Christopher Pittman, age 12, murdered both his grandparents while taking Zoloft.
Mathew Miller, age 13, hanged himself in his bedroom closet after taking Zoloft for 6 days.
Kip Kinkel, age 15, (on Prozac and Ritalin) shot his parents while they slept then went to school and opened fire killing 2 classmates and injuring 22 shortly after beginning Prozac treatment.
Luke Woodham, age 16 (Prozac) killed his mother and then killed two students, wounding six others.
A boy in Pocatello, ID (Zoloft) in 1998 had a Zoloft-induced seizure that caused an armed stand off at his school.
Michael Carneal (Ritalin), age 14, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded..
A young man in Huntsville, Alabama (Ritalin) went psychotic chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.
Andrew Golden, age 11, (Ritalin) and Mitchell Johnson, aged 14, (Ritalin) shot 15 people, killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others.
TJ Solomon, age 15, (Ritalin) high school student in Conyers, Georgia opened fire on and wounded six of his class mates.
Rod Mathews, age 14, (Ritalin) beat a classmate to death with a bat.
James Wilson, age 19, (various psychiatric drugs) from Breenwood, South Carolina, took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers.
Elizabeth Bush, age 13, (Paxil) was responsible for a school shooting in Pennsylvania.
Jason Hoffman (Effexor and Celexa) - school shooting in El Cajon, California.
Jarred Viktor, age 15, (Paxil), after five days on Paxil he stabbed his grandmother 61 times.
The use of SSRIs have been promoted with the erroneous marketing mantra that serotonin is the happiness hormone. That simplistic narrative has many gullible people convinced that it most be good to take SSRIs and anything else the medical business tells them to take.
Yet a sizable volume of research studies demonstrated that increasing serotonin (and tryptophan) with drugs or supplements is linked to brain dysfunction, stress hormone release, cognitive deficits, inflammation, impaired blood circulation in the brain, hypertension, sexual dysfunction, cancer, and other less than "happy" effects - http://www.supplements-and-health.com/tryptophan-side-effects.html (http://www.supplements-and-health.com/tryptophan-side-effects.html)
Undoubtedly, the serotonin-happiness mantra seems to be almost entirely an all-too convenient highly lucrative invention of the medical-pharma business.
As for the media, tonight NBC Nightly News reported the contents of the killer's car, you know, so that would be revenge killers have a checklist to work with.The cynical nature of Rusty Edge's post have created metaphorical hands that are reaching out of the computer monitor to grasp me. *Gasp* ;sarc
They also shared an interview with the grieving father of the victim, just so everybody knows how effective the revenge was, or in case anybody missed yesterday's news.
Obviously the FBI is a bunch of mercenaries.
Hoover wept.
...Because Hoover was AGAINST corruption in office...Pretty much. Hoover wouldn't have tolerated something like the Edgar J Steele
a lesbian sex tape of Eleanor Roosevelt and the black woman from gone with the wind.The Hattie McDaniel pr0n everyone always hoped to see. What a guy, that J. Edgar.
What a guy, that J. Edgar.
Jorge Ramos tells Bill O’Reilly not to lecture him on journalism
Fusion
by AMERICA with Jorge Ramos and Tamara Weston September 02, 2015 8:47 p.m.
Since getting kicked out of Donald [Sleezebag]’s press conference and told to “Get out of my country” by a [Sleezebag] supporter last week, Fusion and Univision anchor Jorge Ramos has been the subject of headlines, to say the least. Some disagreed with his behavior, suggesting his questions were out of turn and even disrespectful to his fellow journalists; others wondered whether he was looking for a confrontation in Iowa.
But perhaps one of Ramos’ most outspoken critics was Fox’s Bill O’Reilly. The political commentator took to his own website to air his grievances with the journalist, calling him “an activist with a radical agenda,” accusing him of failing to disclose the fact that his daughter is working for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign (though he did in June, here), and even saying that Ramos has been “hiding under his escritorio” (Spanish for “desk”) following requests for an interview.
On Wednesday night, the host got what he wanted. Ramos appeared on The O’Reilly Factor to discuss why he disagrees with [Sleezebag]’s plan to build a wall, opposes Kate’s Law, and stands by his actions in Iowa.
“Tonight I just want to get the audience to get to know who you are, Jorge, you know?” O’Reilly started. “They may be horrified, but I think I have to do it.”
O’Reilly kicked things off by asking Ramos why he doesn’t want a border wall that would “stop people from infiltrating from Mexico into the United States.” The host mentioned that a wall could have prevented the death of 32-year-old Kate Steinle, who was recently killed in San Francisco by an undocumented immigrant who had been deported five times. He said this is why the country needs legislation like Kate’s Law.
Ramos disagreed: “I don’t think you are approaching the problem in a global way,” he said, while stressing that he’s not defending criminals.
“You are!” O’Reilly responded. “You’re an enabler. Jorge, you’re enabling guys like Sanchez,” referring to Steinle’s alleged killer.
“You have to concentrate on enforcement, background checks, and at the same time you have to resolve the situation of 11 million people in this country,” Ramos responded.
O’Reilly asked Ramos, “Do you believe that Mexican nationals—and you were one, you came to the United States on a student visa and then, I guess, you did everything, legally, and you’re here and you’re successful—do you believe that Mexican nationals, Guatemalan nationals, Honduran nationals, have a right to come to the United States?”
Ramos said he believes they have a right if done legally but that immigrants are coming to the U.S. because they are also needed here by American companies.
“You want to criminalize a whole community,” Ramos said. “And at the same time, we are also responsible. You think they are just coming because they want to go to Disneyland? Of course not. They are coming because they are doing the jobs nobody else wants to do; we are giving them jobs. That’s why they are coming.”
The Fox host then turned the discussion to Ramos’ career. “You’re an anchorman, how can you possibly cover illegal immigration fairly when you’re an activist, when you’re a proponent of allowing them amnesty?” O’Reilly continued, “You should excuse yourself from it, or recuse yourself from it, or become like me, a commentator.”
“Mr. O’Reilly, I don’t think you are the right person to lecture me on advocacy and journalism when you spend most of your program giving opinions and not asking questions, defending Republicans, criticizing Democrats, and, frankly, conducting interviews—soft interviews—with conservatives that you agree with,” Ramos responded. “The difference between you and me is that you are partisan, and I’m independent.”
Watch the O’Reilly Factor segment here:
So we had another shooting.You were doing so well until the end.
Yesterday, the local news where I am covered the Sheriff's press conference, as he explained that he would not speak the name of the perpetrator, so as not to glorify him or inspire copycats.
After the segment the local newslady says "His name was __________"
Needless to say, I was :mad:
Then last night, my wife tells me I was right and reads me stuff from ______'s social media, praising the shooter I complained about last time, and a couple of other recent ones.
Of course, it's not just the news media, it's also the President. He seems to see political opportunity where I see tragedy, and where feces heads see national recognition from the POTUS.
Thanks Obama!
So we had another shooting.You were doing so well until the end.
Yesterday, the local news where I am covered the Sheriff's press conference, as he explained that he would not speak the name of the perpetrator, so as not to glorify him or inspire copycats.
After the segment the local newslady says "His name was __________"
Needless to say, I was :mad:
Then last night, my wife tells me I was right and reads me stuff from ______'s social media, praising the shooter I complained about last time, and a couple of other recent ones.
Of course, it's not just the news media, it's also the President. He seems to see political opportunity where I see tragedy, and where feces heads see national recognition from the POTUS.
Thanks Obama!
How do you expect people who don't like having so many murder tools in circulation to behave when these senseless instances of murder using said tools pop up? I say he's been derelict in his duty as Our Leader anytime he hasn't made such a speech following such an incident.
Oh, ALWAYS. When I'm emperor of the universe, the first set of proclamations will NOT omit that absolutely NO ONE EVER becomes famous EVER for murder EVER
How do you expect people who don't like having so many murder tools in circulation to behave when these senseless instances of murder using said tools pop up? I say he's been derelict in his duty as Our Leader anytime he hasn't made such a speech following such an incident.