Role Playing Council Number IV - Alpha Centauri Forums

  Alpha Centauri Forums
  The Factions
  Role Playing Council Number IV

profile | register | prefs | faq | search

Author Topic:   Role Playing Council Number IV

President Korian posted 06-15-99 07:13 PM ET
The council for roleplaying in which is always in session.
The Charter is as Follows
1/ All factions have defined limitations all new members need to be approved by the council.
2/ Tech every 3 days. Every two for a UOP clone and every 4 for Believers.
4/Factions can declare war as they wish
5/ Ships are limited to 50 of any type. Spartans are allowed 75
6/ Battles can be lost. No invincible players
7/ All members of Roleplaying are members of the Council
8/ No faction can be vanquished unless it wants so.
9/ All combat for Factions in one folder.
10/All folders to be marked RP
11/ No secret projects. All previous secret projects are to be revoked.
12/ No transcendence
13/Factions may do as they like with regard to civil wars/ rebellions.
14/ No escalating arguments such as
'I have cloaked Ships'
'I can see them with my Tech'
'My tech is better than yours'
'How do you know?'
15/ No time machines
16/ Players are not allowed to travel beyond the Galaxy
17/ no emoticons to be used in council threads.
18/ # of ships be increased to 500 for regulars and 750 for Spartans.
19/ Participation in council threads is mandatory.
20/ Aliens must follow the same rules as humans.
THESE ARE THE POINTS THAT CAME OUT THE REFORMATION. THESE POINTS WON BY MAJORITY VOTE. ANY MORE AMENDMENTS/PROPOSALS WILL BE EXAMINED BY THE COUNCIL.

THOSE PROPOSALS CURRENTLY BEING VOTED UPON
Proposal 21/The creation of NPC's are limited, one must die before another is created. YEA- NAY-1
Proposal 22/ No Star Wars, Star Trek or B5. YEA-4 NEA-2
Proposal 23/ Slow down proposal rate to "One at a time". YEA-3 NEA-2
Proposal 24/ You may travel to other planes AND The Star Wars Galaxy. YEA-1 NEA-1
Ignoring Dehlan/ YEA-1 NEA-0
I�m not going to tell you what proposals you need to vote on, figure that out yourself.
Proposal 25- Each time 6 new Amendments are passed, a new Council Thread is to be started. (YEA)
Proposal 26- We create a "summarizer" for the RPing Council. They would do what I just did for each new Council thread. If noone volunteers to permanently take the position, we do it as follows : Korian does IV, JT does V, AoYoS does VI, etc. etc. (YEA)

JT 3 posted 06-15-99 07:22 PM ET
I would like to change 25 to "every 50 posts, ....". I vote YEA on it if Korian approves the change.
President Korian posted 06-15-99 07:24 PM ET
Ok, once the Council reaches 50 posts a new thread will be started. What about #26 and the Ignoring?
JT 3 posted 06-15-99 07:29 PM ET
Well, I think we should straighten him out with the rules, but I vote NAY for ignoring him.
As for 26, I vote YEA.
Proposal 27: Inter-galaxy permitted(the rule was made when we didn't have the tech for it, now we do)
Spider posted 06-15-99 10:19 PM ET
26: Yea
27: Yea
Ignoring Dehlan: Nay
Spider
standing up for the right to protest
Chancellor AoYoS posted 06-15-99 10:24 PM ET
26: YEA
27: YEA
Ignoring Dehlan: ABSTAIN
Galen posted 06-15-99 11:56 PM ET
25: YEA
26: YEA I vollenteer to do 5
27: ABSTAIN
Ignore Korian: YEA
Galen posted 06-15-99 11:57 PM ET
I meant:
Ignoring Dehlan: YEA
not ignoring Korian.
Chancellor AoYoS posted 06-16-99 09:47 AM ET
Ignoring Dehlan vote is changed to: YEA
In light of him trying to ignore Galen in the AoP thread.
If you go by the rules Dehlan I will change the vote.
Dehlan posted 06-16-99 11:27 AM ET
The only rule that I protest to is no 16. Galen wants to ignore me, so I want to ignore him. When he stops, I stop.
God Emperor Eccles V posted 06-16-99 02:31 PM ET
I explain rule 16 in thread no 3

I vote YEA to 26
I would like to be the summeriser. (please!)
I abstain to ignoring Dehlan, I want to have him on our side.
Dehlan will you please accept the reasons in the council 3 and stop this intercine bickering?

President Korian posted 06-16-99 03:55 PM ET
Alright Eccles can be summarizer. I just thought up that plan incase noone wanted to be the permanent summarizer.
Dehlan posted 06-16-99 08:13 PM ET
Here is a comprimise rule:
No controlling entire galaxys. You may travel between them, but you may NOT control any more then one group from that galaxy.
Chancellor AoYoS posted 06-16-99 10:24 PM ET
I agree with that Dehlan. No controlling colonies in different galaxies either.
Spider posted 06-17-99 12:47 AM ET
AoYoS, try "No controlling colonies in another galaxy unless you have a group in that galaxy."
Spider
We are weakened, depleted are our numbers, but still are we proud, and still we live....
Chancellor AoYoS posted 06-17-99 10:09 AM ET
No spider. No controlling colonies in other galaxies. You cannot control a NPC race either.
Galen posted 06-17-99 01:50 PM ET
But we can be allied with NPCs, like Dehlan is with the NR in the Star Wars galaxy, and I am with the Imps.
Chancellor AoYoS posted 06-17-99 02:08 PM ET
Yes Galen.
Spider posted 06-17-99 05:02 PM ET
AoYoS, you worthless piece of scum! You crossed the line one time too many! Now...you will cease to be....
Spider
Goodbye, AoYoS....
Dehlan posted 06-17-99 05:24 PM ET
I agree with Galen. We can ally, but not control. But can we merge the two???
seth5454 posted 06-17-99 09:53 PM ET
HOLD ON! WAIT A MINUTE! THE NR IS BASICALLY AN EXTENSION OF STARS WARS!!!
Dehlan posted 06-17-99 09:58 PM ET
The NR practicly is Star Wars... You're missing the entire point.
The Great Sephiroth posted 06-18-99 01:50 AM ET
21) Y
22) Y
23) Y
24) Y other planes, N Star Wars
25) Y
26) Y
Ignore people) N
President Korian posted 06-18-99 07:35 PM ET
It looks like #22 has passed! I think we should continue the Star Wars stuff until this current conflict boils down and then drop it.
Sephiroth: You can't vote like that for #22. You either vote totally YEA or totally NEA.
The Great Sephiroth posted 06-18-99 11:49 PM ET
I voted Y on #22
oh, you mean 24
24) Yea
Uh, I thought I was voted in, but it seems it wasn't 'official'. Could we do it here?
The Great Sephiroth posted 06-18-99 11:51 PM ET
I voted Y on #22
oh, you mean 24
24) Yea
Uh, I thought I was voted in, but it seems it wasn't 'official'. Could we do it here?
President Korian posted 06-23-99 07:04 AM ET
I move for the expulsion of Dehlan from RPing from blatant ignorance of the rules.
Chancellor AoYoS posted 06-23-99 10:32 AM ET
I agree with Korian's proposal.
Eccles posted 06-23-99 01:36 PM ET
I abstain on Korians Proposal.
seth5454 posted 06-23-99 02:55 PM ET
Damn i joined the NR for all the wrong reasons. Well who cares im still going to remain a member.
Galen posted 06-23-99 05:30 PM ET
I agree. Remember, we need a supermajority for this to pass. 2/3rds, Dehlan gets a vote.
President Korian posted 06-23-99 09:15 PM ET
Then Eccles is just not recorded, right?
JT 3 posted 06-23-99 09:31 PM ET
Seth, you disagree, right? If you agree with it, then you'll probably be facing the FSA all by yourself.
I vote NAY. I'll vote NAY for anyone, since I don't want to see anyone expelled.
Galen posted 06-23-99 10:28 PM ET
Eccles is not counted. However, the measure will fail. We need 3 more people, all in favor. Unless seth abstains, that is, then we only need 1 more.
Kaljar posted 06-24-99 03:33 AM ET
Nay.
Galen posted 06-24-99 09:01 AM ET
The Measure fails. Dehlan stays in.
seth5454 posted 06-24-99 09:45 AM ET
I would have voted NAY.
President Korian posted 06-24-99 09:46 AM ET
We're only counting 5 votes? We almost had it too, 3/5.
Galen posted 06-24-99 12:12 PM ET
No, becuase Dehlan automatically goes no. The vote was 3 to 3. We would have needed 3 more. Meaning seth, Ronin, and some other guy. That would have won it. However, we can assume seth votes NAY, and then the NAYs have the lead.
seth5454 posted 06-24-99 04:06 PM ET
Didnt i just vote NAY. Y would u assume that i would vote NAY when i already did.
seth5454 posted 06-24-99 04:26 PM ET
28) We cant remove anyone from RPing. we must have a complete vote meaning everyone must agree. The person in question has no vote. The person in question has to depend solely on his peers.
Chancellor AoYoS posted 06-24-99 05:07 PM ET
28. NEA
President Korian posted 06-24-99 05:17 PM ET
NEA on 28
Galen posted 06-24-99 07:26 PM ET
NAY
seth5454 posted 06-25-99 11:28 AM ET
29) Any off topic messages written in a thread should be ignored.
Eccles posted 06-25-99 02:02 PM ET
NEA, just a majority vote is needed.
Korian, sbout time you started a new thread, but with the ammended rules at the top (not just the old ones)
Galen posted 06-25-99 03:57 PM ET
Proposal 30)No Star Wars/Non-SMAC Sci-Fi
30:YEA, and I think I might quit otherwise.
Sethito posted 06-25-99 04:30 PM ET
What is this thing, etc. etc. please tell me. I would like to know.
seth5454 posted 06-25-99 08:44 PM ET
Galen are you voting for yoour own ammendment or did you have a mistake.
30) As long as the NR is not abolished i vote YEA.
Chancellor AoYoS posted 06-25-99 09:46 PM ET
GOD **** NR.
30. YEA FULLY TOTALLY
President Korian posted 06-25-99 09:55 PM ET
29-NAY
30-YEA
Eccles- I thought you volunteered to do that. Oh well.
To close this thread, click here (moderator or admin only).


Hop to:

Contact Us | Alpha Centauri Home

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.18
© Madrona Park, Inc., 1998.

Author	Topic: Role Playing Council Number IV
President Korian	posted 06-15-99 07:13 PM ET The council for roleplaying in which is always in session. The Charter is as Follows 1/ All factions have defined limitations all new members need to be approved by the council. 2/ Tech every 3 days. Every two for a UOP clone and every 4 for Believers. 4/Factions can declare war as they wish 5/ Ships are limited to 50 of any type. Spartans are allowed 75 6/ Battles can be lost. No invincible players 7/ All members of Roleplaying are members of the Council 8/ No faction can be vanquished unless it wants so. 9/ All combat for Factions in one folder. 10/All folders to be marked RP 11/ No secret projects. All previous secret projects are to be revoked. 12/ No transcendence 13/Factions may do as they like with regard to civil wars/ rebellions. 14/ No escalating arguments such as 'I have cloaked Ships' 'I can see them with my Tech' 'My tech is better than yours' 'How do you know?' 15/ No time machines 16/ Players are not allowed to travel beyond the Galaxy 17/ no emoticons to be used in council threads. 18/ # of ships be increased to 500 for regulars and 750 for Spartans. 19/ Participation in council threads is mandatory. 20/ Aliens must follow the same rules as humans. THESE ARE THE POINTS THAT CAME OUT THE REFORMATION. THESE POINTS WON BY MAJORITY VOTE. ANY MORE AMENDMENTS/PROPOSALS WILL BE EXAMINED BY THE COUNCIL. THOSE PROPOSALS CURRENTLY BEING VOTED UPON Proposal 21/The creation of NPC's are limited, one must die before another is created. YEA- NAY-1 Proposal 22/ No Star Wars, Star Trek or B5. YEA-4 NEA-2 Proposal 23/ Slow down proposal rate to "One at a time". YEA-3 NEA-2 Proposal 24/ You may travel to other planes AND The Star Wars Galaxy. YEA-1 NEA-1 Ignoring Dehlan/ YEA-1 NEA-0 I�m not going to tell you what proposals you need to vote on, figure that out yourself. Proposal 25- Each time 6 new Amendments are passed, a new Council Thread is to be started. (YEA) Proposal 26- We create a "summarizer" for the RPing Council. They would do what I just did for each new Council thread. If noone volunteers to permanently take the position, we do it as follows : Korian does IV, JT does V, AoYoS does VI, etc. etc. (YEA)
JT 3	posted 06-15-99 07:22 PM ET I would like to change 25 to "every 50 posts, ....". I vote YEA on it if Korian approves the change.
President Korian	posted 06-15-99 07:24 PM ET Ok, once the Council reaches 50 posts a new thread will be started. What about #26 and the Ignoring?
JT 3	posted 06-15-99 07:29 PM ET Well, I think we should straighten him out with the rules, but I vote NAY for ignoring him. As for 26, I vote YEA. Proposal 27: Inter-galaxy permitted(the rule was made when we didn't have the tech for it, now we do)
Spider	posted 06-15-99 10:19 PM ET 26: Yea 27: Yea Ignoring Dehlan: Nay Spider standing up for the right to protest
Chancellor AoYoS	posted 06-15-99 10:24 PM ET 26: YEA 27: YEA Ignoring Dehlan: ABSTAIN
Galen	posted 06-15-99 11:56 PM ET 25: YEA 26: YEA I vollenteer to do 5 27: ABSTAIN Ignore Korian: YEA
Galen	posted 06-15-99 11:57 PM ET I meant: Ignoring Dehlan: YEA not ignoring Korian.
Chancellor AoYoS	posted 06-16-99 09:47 AM ET Ignoring Dehlan vote is changed to: YEA In light of him trying to ignore Galen in the AoP thread. If you go by the rules Dehlan I will change the vote.
Dehlan	posted 06-16-99 11:27 AM ET The only rule that I protest to is no 16. Galen wants to ignore me, so I want to ignore him. When he stops, I stop.
God Emperor Eccles V	posted 06-16-99 02:31 PM ET I explain rule 16 in thread no 3 I vote YEA to 26 I would like to be the summeriser. (please!) I abstain to ignoring Dehlan, I want to have him on our side. Dehlan will you please accept the reasons in the council 3 and stop this intercine bickering?
President Korian	posted 06-16-99 03:55 PM ET Alright Eccles can be summarizer. I just thought up that plan incase noone wanted to be the permanent summarizer.
Dehlan	posted 06-16-99 08:13 PM ET Here is a comprimise rule: No controlling entire galaxys. You may travel between them, but you may NOT control any more then one group from that galaxy.
Chancellor AoYoS	posted 06-16-99 10:24 PM ET I agree with that Dehlan. No controlling colonies in different galaxies either.
Spider	posted 06-17-99 12:47 AM ET AoYoS, try "No controlling colonies in another galaxy unless you have a group in that galaxy." Spider We are weakened, depleted are our numbers, but still are we proud, and still we live....
Chancellor AoYoS	posted 06-17-99 10:09 AM ET No spider. No controlling colonies in other galaxies. You cannot control a NPC race either.
Galen	posted 06-17-99 01:50 PM ET But we can be allied with NPCs, like Dehlan is with the NR in the Star Wars galaxy, and I am with the Imps.
Chancellor AoYoS	posted 06-17-99 02:08 PM ET Yes Galen.
Spider	posted 06-17-99 05:02 PM ET AoYoS, you worthless piece of scum! You crossed the line one time too many! Now...you will cease to be.... Spider Goodbye, AoYoS....
Dehlan	posted 06-17-99 05:24 PM ET I agree with Galen. We can ally, but not control. But can we merge the two???
seth5454	posted 06-17-99 09:53 PM ET HOLD ON! WAIT A MINUTE! THE NR IS BASICALLY AN EXTENSION OF STARS WARS!!!
Dehlan	posted 06-17-99 09:58 PM ET The NR practicly is Star Wars... You're missing the entire point.
The Great Sephiroth	posted 06-18-99 01:50 AM ET 21) Y 22) Y 23) Y 24) Y other planes, N Star Wars 25) Y 26) Y Ignore people) N
President Korian	posted 06-18-99 07:35 PM ET It looks like #22 has passed! I think we should continue the Star Wars stuff until this current conflict boils down and then drop it. Sephiroth: You can't vote like that for #22. You either vote totally YEA or totally NEA.
The Great Sephiroth	posted 06-18-99 11:49 PM ET I voted Y on #22 oh, you mean 24 24) Yea Uh, I thought I was voted in, but it seems it wasn't 'official'. Could we do it here?
The Great Sephiroth	posted 06-18-99 11:51 PM ET I voted Y on #22 oh, you mean 24 24) Yea Uh, I thought I was voted in, but it seems it wasn't 'official'. Could we do it here?
President Korian	posted 06-23-99 07:04 AM ET I move for the expulsion of Dehlan from RPing from blatant ignorance of the rules.
Chancellor AoYoS	posted 06-23-99 10:32 AM ET I agree with Korian's proposal.
Eccles	posted 06-23-99 01:36 PM ET I abstain on Korians Proposal.
seth5454	posted 06-23-99 02:55 PM ET Damn i joined the NR for all the wrong reasons. Well who cares im still going to remain a member.
Galen	posted 06-23-99 05:30 PM ET I agree. Remember, we need a supermajority for this to pass. 2/3rds, Dehlan gets a vote.
President Korian	posted 06-23-99 09:15 PM ET Then Eccles is just not recorded, right?
JT 3	posted 06-23-99 09:31 PM ET Seth, you disagree, right? If you agree with it, then you'll probably be facing the FSA all by yourself. I vote NAY. I'll vote NAY for anyone, since I don't want to see anyone expelled.
Galen	posted 06-23-99 10:28 PM ET Eccles is not counted. However, the measure will fail. We need 3 more people, all in favor. Unless seth abstains, that is, then we only need 1 more.
Kaljar	posted 06-24-99 03:33 AM ET Nay.
Galen	posted 06-24-99 09:01 AM ET The Measure fails. Dehlan stays in.
seth5454	posted 06-24-99 09:45 AM ET I would have voted NAY.
President Korian	posted 06-24-99 09:46 AM ET We're only counting 5 votes? We almost had it too, 3/5.
Galen	posted 06-24-99 12:12 PM ET No, becuase Dehlan automatically goes no. The vote was 3 to 3. We would have needed 3 more. Meaning seth, Ronin, and some other guy. That would have won it. However, we can assume seth votes NAY, and then the NAYs have the lead.
seth5454	posted 06-24-99 04:06 PM ET Didnt i just vote NAY. Y would u assume that i would vote NAY when i already did.
seth5454	posted 06-24-99 04:26 PM ET 28) We cant remove anyone from RPing. we must have a complete vote meaning everyone must agree. The person in question has no vote. The person in question has to depend solely on his peers.
Chancellor AoYoS	posted 06-24-99 05:07 PM ET 28. NEA
President Korian	posted 06-24-99 05:17 PM ET NEA on 28
Galen	posted 06-24-99 07:26 PM ET NAY
seth5454	posted 06-25-99 11:28 AM ET 29) Any off topic messages written in a thread should be ignored.
Eccles	posted 06-25-99 02:02 PM ET NEA, just a majority vote is needed. Korian, sbout time you started a new thread, but with the ammended rules at the top (not just the old ones)
Galen	posted 06-25-99 03:57 PM ET Proposal 30)No Star Wars/Non-SMAC Sci-Fi 30:YEA, and I think I might quit otherwise.
Sethito	posted 06-25-99 04:30 PM ET What is this thing, etc. etc. please tell me. I would like to know.
seth5454	posted 06-25-99 08:44 PM ET Galen are you voting for yoour own ammendment or did you have a mistake. 30) As long as the NR is not abolished i vote YEA.
Chancellor AoYoS	posted 06-25-99 09:46 PM ET GOD **** NR. 30. YEA FULLY TOTALLY
President Korian	posted 06-25-99 09:55 PM ET 29-NAY 30-YEA Eccles- I thought you volunteered to do that. Oh well.