posted 03-10-99 05:57 AM ET
Ouch. This may have become the quickest thread in the history of the forum to turn so nasty so quickly.Rubikhan: I don't know why you are so disappointed in SMAC, but I wish you well in further computing ventures. I'm sorry that SMAC apparently is the game for you, but your disappointment does not mean that the game "is a stain on their aura" [Ok, OK, so that wasn't a direct quotation. It just seemed right.
yin: A wonderful attempt at sarcasm. Not more than an attempt, but a good one nonetheless. 
Ashbri: I've not seen you before, so you might be new to this forum, but prior to ... oh... about two weeks ago, we forumites at least tried to be polite and rational in our discourse. Now if you are a forum regular whom I've somehow missed, then I understand your frustration at the plethora of seemingly-anti-SMAC threads, but one can still be civil.
Undertaker: The propagator of that rumor has retracted his remark. We know that you are anti-SMAC, but promoting a known falsehood in an attack on honorable and diligent people is beneath even you. Please show some restraint in the future.