|
Alpha Centauri Forums
Non-SMAC related Woohoo, my site is actually starting to take off! |
Author | Topic: Woohoo, my site is actually starting to take off! |
Picker |
posted 06-22-99 03:16 PM ET
After getting a mere 50 hits in the first 4 months it was up, I have gotten 100 in the last week. BAAAAAAAD!!!!! YOU HATE THAT!!!! |
JohnIII |
posted 06-22-99 03:18 PM ET
Mine has been.... disbanded for the moment. John III |
JohnIII |
posted 06-22-99 03:19 PM ET
You don't like NoFrames users, do you? John III |
Picker |
posted 06-22-99 03:24 PM ET
Oh damn, I didn't actually think there were still browsers that couldn't handle frames. Guess I'll have to make a no frames version, just for you of course john. |
JohnIII |
posted 06-22-99 03:27 PM ET
Hey, I have frames, I just always check what people say in the "NoFrames" bit. John III |
Dreadnought |
posted 06-22-99 03:29 PM ET
Picker, what's the address for your site? |
JohnIII |
posted 06-22-99 03:31 PM ET
It is here. John III |
Picker |
posted 06-22-99 03:37 PM ET
And the no frames bit was basically for a friend of mine, who at the time was using an old ****ty browser. |
Dreadnought |
posted 06-22-99 03:40 PM ET
So using the "ROMs", I can play SNES games on my computer? Sweet! I was going insane trying to find my copy of Final Fantasy 3! |
Thue |
posted 06-22-99 04:05 PM ET
Um, what kind of ROMs are they anyway? I failed to find that anywhere on your page... "SNES games" as Dreadnought said? What are those? |
Dreadnought |
posted 06-22-99 04:10 PM ET
Thue, SNES= Super Nintendo Entertainment System. I just downloaded Final Fantasy 3, but the problem is I can't get any of the controls to work.....Picker, any help would be nice hehe |
Fjorxc the Maniac |
posted 06-22-99 04:11 PM ET
Thue: "SNES" refers to the Super Nintendo Entertainment System or Super Nintendo, the system that came oot in 1991 between the Neolithic Nintendo and the N64.
|
Eris |
posted 06-22-99 04:41 PM ET
"Oh damn, I didn't actually think there were still browsers that couldn't handle frames." Any text-based browser. Well, lynx handles them, but not gracefully. Some of us prefer them... and text-> voice users, naturally, are using them. Some of us also would prefer to never, ever, ever see a site with frames even when using, say, Netscape. Frames are almost never actually particularly useful and unless you've got a horrifically complex site to navigate are really unnecessary, IMO. They just take up space. A better option is to make your pages so you rarely have to scroll up/down more than 2 pagedowns and put the menu either at the top or at the bottom, or do a side menu using tables (handled /much/ more gracefully in text browsers) with fixed width columns. Other things I hate to see on pages: people who use background images but don't set the bgcolor (really, trust me, there's a reason) or all the various text-type colors; hy00ge graphics on the front page of a site, particularly if that's the only thing on the front page; people who don't put in alt tags; people who present the majority of their content via Java or Shockwave (I have Java turned off, and am just as likely to be using a text browser anyhow). I'm rather opinionated on the topic of web page design. I had/will have again (my pages are currently down) a hall of shame of pages I used to link to until they were redesigned, or pages I was going to link to until I saw the design. As I've designed (and been paid to design) a lot of web pages and actually know what goes into it, I know how long it takes to make sure one's pages are accessible and easily readable, so I'm extremely picky, particularly about certain things. I am fine with, for instance, pages that use animation and Java applets, provided that a) the initial page is low-bandwidth and b) nothing vital to the information a typical web user would be visiting that site for is contained in a graphic or Shockwave or Java or something else in that vein. But as soon as that latter qualification isn't conformed with, I will no longer use that page. I didn't buy EA games for 3 years because I was so ticked at them about their web pages and their absolute lack of response when I emailed them about them. None of this is directed to you, Picker; I haven't looked at your pages. But this soap box is stuck to my feet... Eris (http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/ for more on this topic) |
jig |
posted 06-22-99 05:45 PM ET
Eris: Since you're a professional webmaster, could you please take a look at my homepage design? I haven't worked on it in almost a year now though. Anyway, its at http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/Marina/6688/home.htm . Yeah, I'm going to move it out of geocities as soon as I get off my lazy ass. Those popups are truly annoying. |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-22-99 06:26 PM ET
Uhmm...yah Picker, your site is cool. You don't need to get rid of those frames since they're ok and no-one uses old browsers any more. Oh yes, and i needed some C64 emulators..not sure if you got them on your site...i will look, but if you havent got them on...could you please contact me about this? I'm realy missing some of the games i used to play...like Spy vs Spy, or the game with the knight throwing spears at skeletons (not sure what the name was) and afcourse, the one with the penguin that pushes ice blocks around trying to put a lined combination of them (wtf?) no name again. Thnx upfron. Actualy (OH REALY??) i have a site(page) of my own. It's on Homestead and you can see it in the info (cheers newbies). I made it a month ago, and it had 1200+ hits since. No, i'm not sure why. Maybe it was the good promoting strategy or something? I have a special group called Site in my ICQ. They are 50 or so specialy chosen fellas that always pass on the incoming URL to the ones on their list. Also i added my site to every possible search engine four+ times. And, i update it every day, for which i receive many mails of recognition from the users. I ought to get myself employed in some web promotion agency or somethin
|
DanS |
posted 06-22-99 09:15 PM ET
Eris, I can appreciate your pickiness, especially with frames. Not because they aren't useful, but because they look like crap and there's almost always a better way to do it. For some, this is acceptable, but we should hold ourselves to higher standards. The fact of the matter is, many of us spend hours on the web every day. We could surf a bland world, with little creativity. I worry about the effects of experiencing such a bland world for hours on end, year after year. Think American suburban hell and you get my point. Am I emphasizing form over function too much? I don't know. But if you look at this bulletin board, for instance, you can't help but be pleased at the aesthetics. That's why UBB is so successful, even though it isn't the best as far as features go (it's getting better). In any event, I have found that good creative really goes a long way. Make it as pretty and sexy as your pocketbook and creative skills allow. Your users will appreciate it and will reward you with return visits. I haven't taken a look at Pick's site, so this isn't a rant against his apparent use of frames. |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-22-99 11:22 PM ET
About the FRAMES: There's more then one use for Frames concerning design and making of www pages, so if one has enough where one should have enough, there should be no trouble in using frames. I must dissagree about the design of the UBB..it's designed as if my grandma has done the job in the moments of her more exressionistic psychodelic trance Cheers MiKaeLe |
Picker |
posted 06-22-99 11:36 PM ET
What emulator are you using Dread. MikaeLe: C64? Is that commodore 64. For now, I only have Super Nintendo roms, but after I've gotten a bunch of those, like 300, I'll start looking for others. If you want though, I could probably find what you are looking for. |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-22-99 11:45 PM ET
Yes, picker, i just remembered what was the game with the knight name, it's, behold, Ghouls'n'Goblins Can ya dig this up? MiKaeLe |
Dreadnought |
posted 06-22-99 11:50 PM ET
Picker- I'm using the znes. I got Chrono Trigger to work alright, but FFIII just refuses to cooperate. MiKaeLe- Ah, I have fond memories of that game. Me and my Dad used to play it together when I was a kid. I always got a kick out of when if you got hit, the guy's armor flew off and he was in his underware |
MikeH II |
posted 06-23-99 06:36 AM ET
I used frames on my personal website because I haven't got any decent web editing software and wanted to keep common navigation without rebuilding the page every time. (I know I could have done other things to achieve this but I'm very lazy) Frames ARE faster which makes a difference if you are paying for time on-line. Having said that I am planning a major overhaul of the site because I think that there is some good stuff there but it's presented in a really **** way. Saying they are never useful isn't particularly accurate. The number of clients we have who want to be able to see navigation wherever they are on the page is quite high, especially when you are dealing with dynamically generated views and things. Here (navigate to any of the area links) is an example where the customer wanted frames and I think they work well. The UBB is great! |
Picker |
posted 06-23-99 08:32 AM ET
Dread: And you do have it set for 16-bit graphics, right? MikaeLe: I remember that game for nintendo, and know I could find an emulator and a rom for that if you want it. |
DanS |
posted 06-23-99 09:58 AM ET
MikeH: none of us said that frames were never useful. In fact, they are. For instance, you bring up a good point about bandwidth. However, there's almost always a better way to do it. Granted, if you don't have a template style structure to your site, it will be much more time-consuming w/o frames. |
JohnIII |
posted 06-23-99 01:16 PM ET
"Also i added my site to every possible search engine four+ times. " I think some search engines are removing sites which are submitted too many times. John III |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-23-99 03:06 PM ET
JohnIII: think again John. Even Yahoo doesn't remove them...the big search engines don't have time to look over every one of the requests...they receive more then 500 requests per day. And btw, i alway submit my site under a different name and parameters. Picker Please let me know as soon as you get that emulator...and since most of the C64 emulators have 1000games inside i'm sure i'll find all the games i am looking for there.. And i just got the Macromedia pack..including director and all that...anybody got experience with that?
MiKaeLe |
Picker |
posted 06-23-99 03:34 PM ET
Woohoo, I now have 100 roms!!! Woohoo!!! MikaeLe: I will take a look tommorrow and see if I can find them, if I can I will put a link to them here. |
Dreadnought |
posted 06-23-99 03:53 PM ET
Fear not Pick, It's working now. I just couldnt figure out what key eqauled what SNES gamepad button...... Are there emulators for N64 or PSX? |
jig |
posted 06-23-99 06:06 PM ET
Use it if you want, I made it a year ago. |
Picker |
posted 06-23-99 11:38 PM ET
Dread: Yes, the first working N64 emulator came out about four months ago and there are a few playstation emulators(although none of them work perfectly, you can still play a wide range of PSX games through your CD-rom drive). |
Picker |
posted 06-23-99 11:40 PM ET
jig: That's a rather stylish button, I just might use it. |
GaryD |
posted 06-24-99 05:15 AM ET
Emulation Syndication - Didn't seem to find anything. WOT ! No link to here ? |
Picker |
posted 06-24-99 08:35 AM ET
I don't have any smac stuff on my page yet, and the links have similar stuff to what's on my page. |
Q Cubed |
posted 06-24-99 08:49 AM ET
Out of curiosity, what resolution does everyone use? I kinda need it to further develop my site. Is it 800�600? or 1024�768? |
GaryD |
posted 06-24-99 08:58 AM ET
1024�768 |
Galen |
posted 06-24-99 08:59 AM ET
Do any N64 emus work? I haven't tried them. |
Eris |
posted 06-24-99 09:17 AM ET
MiKaeLe: JohnIII: think again John. Even Yahoo doesn't remove them...the big search engines don't have time to look over every one of the requests...they receive more then 500 requests per day. And btw, i alway submit my site under a different name and parameters. You are quite incorrect. If a site is submitted more than x times in a certain period of time at Lycos, Infoseek, Excite, and possibly other places, it will be removed. There isn't any time involved on the part of the search engine maintainers; it's automated. Also, Infoseek used to (not sure since the takeover by Diz-knee) and Excite still does reject site submissions with too many keywords. Now, you could submit your site once a week on a routine basis and keep yourself 'up' in significance ratings that way, but if you just do it 4 times in a row, you may be hosing yourself. I'm not sure where the trip level is. The automated measures are, btw, an effort to keep p0rn0 sites from showing up in every single search someone does; unfortunately, the webmasters of p0rn0 sites are prone to keyword and submission abuse. Your best bet for getting hits, if that's your goal, is to submit once to each of the major search engines and use a well-selected set of keywords, specific and general both, not exceeding a dozen keywords. If your site is multi-purpose, use keywords on each subject-related index page. I also suggest using NOINDEX on all but those index pages and NOFOLLOW on all pages; it keeps people going to your main pages. Eris (One of my [currently down] subsites was averaging 175/hits a day. Trust me.) |
Eris |
posted 06-24-99 09:24 AM ET
I not only use 800x600, I don't use a maximized browser 9 times out of 10. I tend to design for a width near 600, although as a general rule, my pages will fill out to a larger size gracefully. Left-hand columns are fixed-width, right-hand Eris (I also don't 'optimize' for Netscape or Internet Exploder, since that's a fancy way of saying 'using nonstandard HTML') |
Picker |
posted 06-24-99 11:18 AM ET
MikaeLe: I have found the game ghost's and goblin's for the NES, and unless I am mistaken this is the same game as ghoul's and ghost's(either that or it is part one to ghoul's and ghost's). |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-24-99 01:35 PM ET
Eris As i have mentioned: quote: You just missed the end of the sentence where i say that i always put different parametars and names...it's possible to use different URL's, all linking to the same page. And the bots they use on the search engins are pretty easy to trick into submitting your page more times, it's harder with those who use hand work to check every page. Picker: Did you put it on your site? I can't seem to find it there. I always browse and work at 1024x768 since i think it's a pure shame working on a lower resolution, since you get a 35% smaller desktop.
|
Picker |
posted 06-24-99 01:46 PM ET
Okay MikaeLe, I don't want to put it up on my sight cause I am not ready to add Nes to it yet. |
Picker |
posted 06-24-99 01:48 PM ET
ohhh ****, wrong addresses |
Eris |
posted 06-24-99 02:48 PM ET
"You just missed the end of the sentence where i say that i always put different parametars and names" Er, no, I did not. As far as I know, the criteria is solely (although this may differ from search engine to search engine) number of times in time period, and has nothing to do with who is doing the submitting. That's certainly the case for some search engines, if not all. |
Picker |
posted 06-24-99 02:55 PM ET
Eris: But if it's a different person submitting what seems to be a different site? |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-24-99 04:02 PM ET
Picker, yes that's true. And not only a different name, but i use different URL's, as mentioned in the posts above. It's good to have more then one URL. I have one at Homestead, another at XOOM, then at Geocities, at Angelfire etc. But the best option right now is to get one at come to. It's a free service and the only charge for redirection is a pop-up banner. so the latest URL of mine is: http://come.to/ulinkme cool huh? Picker, maybe you ought to get youself one of these. Go to http://come.to and get one. They also give a mail redirection, so you can get a mail like: [email protected] Cheers MiKaeLe |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-24-99 09:55 PM ET
Ahh, yes, i almost forgot. Thanx Picker! |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-24-99 09:57 PM ET
I'm putting a link to you on my page |
Picker |
posted 06-25-99 08:39 AM ET
Cool. Thats an interesting site, all links, all the time. I think I'll have to put a link to you on my sight. |
jig |
posted 06-25-99 11:31 AM ET
I think I'll have to put a link to you on my sight. Ewwww, doesn't it hurt your eyes? |
Picker |
posted 06-25-99 12:11 PM ET
no, my eyes are made of plastic. |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-26-99 09:07 PM ET
Hey, after getting this game...G'n'G that is...i forgot about posting here...lol hey picker, did you get one of those come.to redirects? If so, what's your URL now? and if possible, what's ur ICQ #? Mine is 36540535. MiKaeLe |
Logen |
posted 06-27-99 05:59 PM ET
Hey Picker, do you actualy like Xoom, I have had several sites with them and hate the new frame at the top of the page. Jig: Nice notepad image... LOL Oh yea, almost forgot a PLUG: MY PAGE |
MiKaeLe |
posted 06-27-99 06:44 PM ET
Logen, i see you're a HL fan..sooo...i was...like...wondering if...you could...like...tell me your reg number? Couse i can't seem to menage to play it on WON with the one i have...they put a realy motherfuc*ng excelent protection against unregd net play. MiKaeLe |
Picker |
posted 06-28-99 09:04 AM ET
Logen: Ahhh, but I know how to avoid the little thing at the top of the page. MikaeLe: I'll let you know my ICQ # as soon as I get my computer back. |
Picker |
posted 06-28-99 09:22 AM ET
MikaeLe: welcome.to/Pik |
CarniveaN |
posted 06-30-99 10:31 PM ET
well since everyone seems to be in the mood... hint: clicking on a link will open a new window, or it should. 1st: I suggest using Tripod. You have one pop-up banner when you first visit someones site, and that's it. 2nd: please, check out my website, and tell me what you think. I know there isn't a lot of content, but please tell me how you like the layout. 3rd: I use 1024 x 768 x 16bit, but rarely maximized. I highly suggest making your site friendly to the people that are stuck with 640 x 480. Yes it's laughable these days, but some people still have a 486 handy. Carny |
Spider |
posted 07-01-99 02:42 AM ET
To anyone planning to use the zsnes emulator--either one--and Chrono Trigger: You will find it impossible to see in the 2300 AD buildings (at least the critical ones). However, switching emulators should solve the problem. Spider |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.18
© Madrona Park, Inc., 1998.