Who here thinks we should nuke small annoying countries?

  Alpha Centauri Forums
  Non-SMAC related
  Who here thinks we should nuke small annoying countries?

profile | register | prefs | faq | search

Author Topic:   Who here thinks we should nuke small annoying countries?

Major Bloodnok posted 06-03-99 02:25 PM ET
Start with Scotland
Then Kosovo (hey why not Serbia!)
Then all the stupid African countries that spend their aid money on weapons.
Then Iran

Frodo83 posted 06-03-99 02:30 PM ET
Go jump in the lake.
Hugo Rune posted 06-03-99 02:39 PM ET
How about we just blow up the whole earth, getting rid of every annoying person? (Every other person too, but that's just "collateral damage" as NATO likes to put it...
TheHelperMonkey posted 06-03-99 03:29 PM ET
You can't have a war without civ casualities. Of the thousands of bombs drops only couple are off targets, those are good odds.
CarniveaN posted 06-03-99 03:54 PM ET
I think that the US should eradicate itself from the face of this planet of course there would be a force field set up, so no harm would come to Canada... also I'd be selling "passports" so if you wished not to die, I could set you up, for a little cash of course
Carny
High Priest posted 06-03-99 04:13 PM ET
Don't nuke Scotland, and all you US haters should remember that SMAC and Firaxis are both based in the US.
High Priest
NUKE THE FRENCHIES!!!!!
:O
Spoe posted 06-03-99 04:15 PM ET
Nuke all the US but Maryland? Well, maybe, but only if you let me move there first...
4Horses posted 06-03-99 10:10 PM ET
yes....let's nuke the large annoying countries as well.
Zekkei posted 06-03-99 11:56 PM ET
Nuke everyone! And we can determine who is the fittest to survive by.. well.. whoever is left standing after the clouds of radioactive dust settle.
1212 posted 06-04-99 12:13 AM ET
good point zebbeki. Iran finds the us annoying. Iraq finds the us annoying. whos to decide jackass jones.
High Priest posted 06-04-99 12:46 AM ET
Nuke the Frenchies dammit!!!!!!
High Priest
sober, but still hates Frogs
Mcerion posted 06-04-99 02:23 AM ET
Yeah, let's nuke the US! I hate those vain yanks.
k_shane posted 06-04-99 05:45 AM ET
I'd like to see Russia or China nuke Washington when Clinton is there..
And Helper Monkey stop siding with NATO will you? What has NATO ever done for us except gain us a bad reputation as well as kill men, women, and children?
Long ago the Serbs had accepted peace, but NATO still bombs them..
Before the war 90% of Kosovo was Albanian, when the bombings began, everyone ran.
(ie, refugees)
But of course no one agrees with me that NATO are murderous criminals, along will Bill Clinton, killing people for the sake of "peace".
Siding with the deadly terrorists of the KLA, bombing villages, damn..
This is a very depressing war, why can't Clinton open his mind to other people's thoughts too? Why can't he see what he is damaging the US's repuation ?
There's going to be a protest on June 5th, "Money for Jobs and Education, not war on Yugoslavia." - www.protest.net
Death to NATO and Clinton.
Provost Harrison posted 06-05-99 01:28 PM ET
Why don't we nuke small annoying people like Major Bloodnok.
JonYZ posted 06-06-99 09:00 AM ET
You might want to take a minute to think before you nuke the US. See there was this little war maybe you heard of it. It was called the COLD WAR. Now during this period the US built up a nuclear arsonal big enough to completely nuke the whole world at least three times over. The better part of these nukes are in underground bunkers and missile silos, out of reach of enemy nukes. So by nuking the US you end the world taking your little selves with it. AHH but wait theres more. If somehow we didn't retaliate you'd feel the blow indirectly. The US is the biggest single industrial and economic powerhouse in the world. You take it out of the picture and all hell breaks loose. You know when them asian economies were falling how everybody felt the effects, take that and multiply it by a million. Governments would fall, people would starve, and a power gap would rain supreme. It wouldn't nessecerely mean you would starve but consider you having little to no money and every store if they had something to sell it would be 50x as much. Not to mention the US probably save you people more often in history than you care to remember. If not in WWI than defanatly in WW2 and unless you think living in a Socialist country is a good time than in the Cold War too. If we wern't here stopping them the Russians might have decided to use their nukes, to easily subdue countries. So a little research migh be in order before you just say bye to the most powerful nation to ever exist on the face of this earth. Oh and the NATO thing. ITS A DAMN WAR. If the governments of the people that got killed didn't want them to be dead they would have sined a peace treaty long ago. What if somebody was invading your country and telling you to leave or die, would you not want some help. Nukes should never be used they are a good reason not to have war not another tool to wage it with. Anyway have a good day and think about it before you just start hating things having no idea why.
Q Cubed posted 06-06-99 09:57 PM ET
hmmm...
sounds like a good idea.
This proves that mankind has no reason to live.
And good riddens, it's time that bacterium claim the earth to themselves!
Bacterium of the World Unite! Triumph over the world after all the solid multicells die of radiation sickness!
Roland posted 06-07-99 03:59 AM ET
JonYZ, you're way overstating the importance the US' importance. Somewhere, there gotta be BigE's thread "If the US no longer existed" or so... overall conclusion: no big deal...
To close this thread, click here (moderator or admin only).


Hop to:

Contact Us | Alpha Centauri Home

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.18
© Madrona Park, Inc., 1998.

Author	Topic: Who here thinks we should nuke small annoying countries?
Major Bloodnok	posted 06-03-99 02:25 PM ET Start with Scotland Then Kosovo (hey why not Serbia!) Then all the stupid African countries that spend their aid money on weapons. Then Iran
Frodo83	posted 06-03-99 02:30 PM ET Go jump in the lake.
Hugo Rune	posted 06-03-99 02:39 PM ET How about we just blow up the whole earth, getting rid of every annoying person? (Every other person too, but that's just "collateral damage" as NATO likes to put it...
TheHelperMonkey	posted 06-03-99 03:29 PM ET You can't have a war without civ casualities. Of the thousands of bombs drops only couple are off targets, those are good odds.
CarniveaN	posted 06-03-99 03:54 PM ET I think that the US should eradicate itself from the face of this planet of course there would be a force field set up, so no harm would come to Canada... also I'd be selling "passports" so if you wished not to die, I could set you up, for a little cash of course Carny
High Priest	posted 06-03-99 04:13 PM ET Don't nuke Scotland, and all you US haters should remember that SMAC and Firaxis are both based in the US. High Priest NUKE THE FRENCHIES!!!!! :O
Spoe	posted 06-03-99 04:15 PM ET Nuke all the US but Maryland? Well, maybe, but only if you let me move there first...
4Horses	posted 06-03-99 10:10 PM ET yes....let's nuke the large annoying countries as well.
Zekkei	posted 06-03-99 11:56 PM ET Nuke everyone! And we can determine who is the fittest to survive by.. well.. whoever is left standing after the clouds of radioactive dust settle.
1212	posted 06-04-99 12:13 AM ET good point zebbeki. Iran finds the us annoying. Iraq finds the us annoying. whos to decide jackass jones.
High Priest	posted 06-04-99 12:46 AM ET Nuke the Frenchies dammit!!!!!! High Priest sober, but still hates Frogs
Mcerion	posted 06-04-99 02:23 AM ET Yeah, let's nuke the US! I hate those vain yanks.
k_shane	posted 06-04-99 05:45 AM ET I'd like to see Russia or China nuke Washington when Clinton is there.. And Helper Monkey stop siding with NATO will you? What has NATO ever done for us except gain us a bad reputation as well as kill men, women, and children? Long ago the Serbs had accepted peace, but NATO still bombs them.. Before the war 90% of Kosovo was Albanian, when the bombings began, everyone ran. (ie, refugees) But of course no one agrees with me that NATO are murderous criminals, along will Bill Clinton, killing people for the sake of "peace". Siding with the deadly terrorists of the KLA, bombing villages, damn.. This is a very depressing war, why can't Clinton open his mind to other people's thoughts too? Why can't he see what he is damaging the US's repuation ? There's going to be a protest on June 5th, "Money for Jobs and Education, not war on Yugoslavia." - www.protest.net Death to NATO and Clinton.
Provost Harrison	posted 06-05-99 01:28 PM ET Why don't we nuke small annoying people like Major Bloodnok.
JonYZ	posted 06-06-99 09:00 AM ET You might want to take a minute to think before you nuke the US. See there was this little war maybe you heard of it. It was called the COLD WAR. Now during this period the US built up a nuclear arsonal big enough to completely nuke the whole world at least three times over. The better part of these nukes are in underground bunkers and missile silos, out of reach of enemy nukes. So by nuking the US you end the world taking your little selves with it. AHH but wait theres more. If somehow we didn't retaliate you'd feel the blow indirectly. The US is the biggest single industrial and economic powerhouse in the world. You take it out of the picture and all hell breaks loose. You know when them asian economies were falling how everybody felt the effects, take that and multiply it by a million. Governments would fall, people would starve, and a power gap would rain supreme. It wouldn't nessecerely mean you would starve but consider you having little to no money and every store if they had something to sell it would be 50x as much. Not to mention the US probably save you people more often in history than you care to remember. If not in WWI than defanatly in WW2 and unless you think living in a Socialist country is a good time than in the Cold War too. If we wern't here stopping them the Russians might have decided to use their nukes, to easily subdue countries. So a little research migh be in order before you just say bye to the most powerful nation to ever exist on the face of this earth. Oh and the NATO thing. ITS A DAMN WAR. If the governments of the people that got killed didn't want them to be dead they would have sined a peace treaty long ago. What if somebody was invading your country and telling you to leave or die, would you not want some help. Nukes should never be used they are a good reason not to have war not another tool to wage it with. Anyway have a good day and think about it before you just start hating things having no idea why.
Q Cubed	posted 06-06-99 09:57 PM ET hmmm... sounds like a good idea. This proves that mankind has no reason to live. And good riddens, it's time that bacterium claim the earth to themselves! Bacterium of the World Unite! Triumph over the world after all the solid multicells die of radiation sickness!
Roland	posted 06-07-99 03:59 AM ET JonYZ, you're way overstating the importance the US' importance. Somewhere, there gotta be BigE's thread "If the US no longer existed" or so... overall conclusion: no big deal...