|
Alpha Centauri Forums
Non-SMAC related SETI@HOME |
Author | Topic: SETI@HOME |
Starchild |
posted 05-14-99 03:39 PM ET
It's out (finally), download it at Seti@Home Help search for aliens! |
Singularity |
posted 05-14-99 04:05 PM ET
Great! I want it. I read about it. Give it to me! Me me me, mine mine mine! |
jbutler3 |
posted 05-16-99 07:19 PM ET
I've already processed 3 units! I am interested in how long others are taking to process a unit. I am on a 266G3 running OS8.6 and it is taking me about 26 hours to process a unit. Compared to the average of other PPC processed units I am taking about 8 hours longs. I would expect to be processing them as fast or faster than the average considering I am on a G3, one of the fastest PPC computers. |
JB |
posted 05-16-99 11:58 PM ET
Well, **** you My P100 has been processing for 48 hrs, and is 19% done w/one unit. Oh, well. I'm getting a new comp this summer. PIII550! |
Kyle |
posted 05-17-99 12:02 AM ET
Bah! I've downloaded it twice and it won't install. I've resorted to asking someone to download it for me, then sending it my way.
|
Spoe |
posted 05-17-99 02:07 AM ET
Been looking forward to this for some time now... |
Ronbo |
posted 05-17-99 03:22 AM ET
I am processing my first unit right now. It's going to take a while, although I am running it all the time (I have the RAM to do it, and my processor is decent too). |
GaryD |
posted 05-17-99 05:49 AM ET
Ha ! Put my name down for this months ago. Where's my e-mail telling me it's ready ? |
GaryD |
posted 05-17-99 05:52 AM ET
Arrhh the idiots have taken too long. They've got it downloaded as ftp and the firewall was changed to stop that about a month ago !!!!
|
Kyle |
posted 05-17-99 11:02 AM ET
Got it working, on my first packet of data, close to ten hours now, at a little over 10% done. With a Pentium 200. Strange though, when I took the screen saver off, my mouse froze, and I couldn't connect to the internet. A leason there, don't turn on the screen saver, since you'll probally just keep it running in your system tray. |
Spoe |
posted 05-17-99 12:11 PM ET
With my o/c Celeron-A 450, under linux, it's running at just a hair over 8 hours/unit. |
Ronbo |
posted 05-18-99 02:13 AM ET
I don't know what the problem is, but it has been 25 hours on my, and only 56% done. I'm not running something anemic; I have a PII/350 w/ 128 MB of RAM. I am not doing any processor-intensive stuff; in fact, outside of a few hours of web-browsing and chat (mIRC) I have't used the computer at all. Bummer. |
umbra1 |
posted 05-18-99 10:24 AM ET
Thanks for the tip guys, Seti@Home is one of the best idea I've ever seen. Getting idle machines to do a useful task instead of running screensavers - Excellent ! Every capable PC in my office is now numbercruching the seti data. Umbra1: Wondering what would happen if anyone found an ET transmission ? |
GaryD |
posted 05-18-99 10:33 AM ET
Ha I've found one. It says "You have five days to lodge an appeal before your world is demolished to make way for the intergalactic highway. |
MikeH II |
posted 05-18-99 11:57 AM ET
It's alright GaryD the highway will bring a lot of tourists to shops in the surrounding area. |
Spoe |
posted 05-18-99 04:58 PM ET
Ronbo: Dunno. It may be that the windows code is inherently less efficient than the *nix code or in some other way be OS dependent. |
Spoe |
posted 05-18-99 05:00 PM ET
BTW, after 5 blocks my average time is ~6hr 52min. |
Kyle |
posted 05-18-99 06:28 PM ET
Just so everyone knows, I read on a BBC article about this, that a small "five minute download would provide enough data for a couple days of processing"(paraphrasing). So, I believe this is normal; the time it's taking to analyze the data. |
umbra1 |
posted 05-18-99 06:50 PM ET
My lil' celeron 333 has taken 5 hours to do 10%. I hope Seti isn't in a hurry for their data... |
jig |
posted 05-19-99 06:30 AM ET
My lil' old P166 (32mb, win98) has done 14% of 1 unit in 13 hours of processing. Has anybody found ANYTHING interesting? |
GaryD |
posted 05-19-99 08:19 AM ET
With the number of people having a go, SETI is going to get plenty of data, plenty fast enough. |
Doctor Who |
posted 05-19-99 09:19 AM ET
When do you guys ever get to play SMAC ? ;-) |
umbra1 |
posted 05-19-99 10:24 AM ET
I'm mostly playing by email now so my PC has plenty of time of look for ETs...Still nothing yet except for a brief message reading "Bake me to your lemur" or something like that. |
Rong |
posted 05-19-99 11:39 AM ET
I finished my first unit in a bit over 42 hours on my AMD K6-III 400MHz/128 MB/Windoze 98. I guess they didn't put in any 3DNow optimization. |
Kyle |
posted 05-19-99 12:26 PM ET
Speaking of finding anything interesting, does anyone know what the hell they're looking at? I've gotten several high spikes on the graph that shows up, but I'm assuming that "Strongest Peak Power" and "Strongest Gausian Power" are the things that we should be looking at. |
umbra1 |
posted 05-19-99 12:58 PM ET
Check out the seti@home site (see top of this thread for URL) They've got detailed information there about what the data means and what they're looking for. |
SnowFire |
posted 05-19-99 02:10 PM ET
Hey, I put my name in a long time ago, and got no email! No fair. Spoe, I envy your specs. Fortunately I should be getting a nice new beast myself somewhat soon. GaryD: I tried to raise the Alpha Centauri Galactic Highway Office, but their reciever must be down. I guess that they'll delay the construction of they hyperspace bypass until they get communications going again... right? |
Spoe |
posted 05-19-99 03:36 PM ET
Rong: Just a guess, but it seems to me there is a good chance that they are using more than single precision floating point(all that is supported by 3DNow!, MMX, and KNI) for the majority of the calculations, so there'd not be much advantage, if any, in using 3DNow!. |
GaryD |
posted 05-20-99 06:51 AM ET
Don't bet your world on it ! |
The DirectorGeneral |
posted 05-20-99 07:47 AM ET
The chip in my head tells me that my alien masters approve of this technology. This makes me happy... I go now to download it. |
Undersea Dragon |
posted 05-24-99 02:22 AM ET
I have completed 3 units so far. My average time is 29 hours per unit. I'm running a Celeron 300a (@450) with 128MB of ram and Win98. This has got to be one of the best ideas I have ever heard of. The man that thought this one up should get a raise! Has anyone else noticed that it can be downright impossible to connect to the server to get new info during primetime net use? I have a feeling a lot of people are doing this! |
DanS |
posted 05-24-99 12:57 PM ET
Damn, my firm has a firewall with an open port at 8080, not 80. Did you check out this entry in the top users... NAME: swoporola Must be nice to have a Cray... |
Spoe |
posted 05-24-99 01:50 PM ET
"My average time is 29 hours per unit. I'm running a Celeron 300a (@450) with 128MB of ram and Win98." I guess this confirms my theory that the *nix versions are inherently more efficient than the windows versions. With my box(300a o/c to 450, 128 Mb, Linux), I'm averaging between 7 and 8 hours per unit(overall at about 13 hours due to mixing in data from my desktop at work). |
DanS |
posted 05-24-99 02:02 PM ET
Spoe, have you tried a Solaris 7 box? |
Spoe |
posted 05-24-99 09:56 PM ET
DanS: Nope. Don't have access to a Slowaris box. |
DanS |
posted 05-25-99 09:53 AM ET
So it's slower? |
Spoe |
posted 05-25-99 02:09 PM ET
DanS: Dunno. Last time I worked on a Sun OS it was SunOS 4.03(IIRC, the version of SunOS before Solaris was released), during the transition from a BSD-based system to SYS5(again, IIRC. It may have been the other direction) on a SparcStation IPC. That was hardly a speed demon, though a switch to gcc instead of the then-bundled Sun cc increased performance substantially(IIRC in the neighborhood of 10-20%. Of course it had no effect on I/O performance, etc.). Since then I've worked a little with HP-UX, Digital Unix, FreeBSD, linux, NeXT(on genuine NeXT hardware). |
Victor Galis |
posted 05-28-99 09:30 PM ET
I finally have it, though it may take me as long as 80 hours to get that first unit processed. I suggest we get together and form a team of people from the forums. |
JB |
posted 05-28-99 11:15 PM ET
That would be good. Who's going to form the team? So far, I have 14 or 15 units completed, thanks to the computers at my school (iMacs rule! =) |
jig |
posted 05-29-99 04:04 AM ET
I'll join the team... |
Victor Galis |
posted 05-29-99 10:02 AM ET
I think I'll start a new thread dedicated to the team. |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.18
© Madrona Park, Inc., 1998.