|
Alpha Centauri Forums
The Game SNAC Alternative |
Author | Topic: SNAC Alternative |
Shining1 |
posted 06-12-99 02:15 AM ET
SNAC ShiNing1's Alpha Centauri No, I'm not claiming I wrote a new version. This is just the alternative alpha/faction edit I use when I want to play a 'builder' game instead of a 'conqueror' one. Given the imbalances between the two styles in the original game, I thought I could do a bit of rebalancing by myself. Seems to have worked, so far. Anyone who wants a copy of the actual game files can email me. This is simply a condensed list of all the changes.
Goal:
* Starting energy reserves for each faction increased to 50 ** 'Free' terraforming options are aquifier, forest, road, level terrain, clear fungus
ALL FACTIONS:
Vision: Little has been altered, save to bring them a little more back into the public domain (free morale and probe for fundamentalist), and to scale back slightly their ability to create huge legions within the first 50 turns. Changes: Datalinks Info:
No datalinks changes
Vision: The Hive has been changed to favour a more population based approach to planet domination, with the hugely advantagous +1 INDUSTRY removed entirely. The original 'Enhanced Communist China' vision has been restored - a huge, hardworking, but somewhat unhappy population in a brutal but philosophical ditatorship. Changes: Datalinks info:
Vision: Definitely the weakest of the original factions, morgan has been upgraded to a more reasonable level of unbridled capitalist power. Now able to maintain a normal army, and with no real dependance on outside trade for energy production, Morgan's only worry is a crippling lack of growth. * Changed starting tech to Industrial economics (allows Free market immediately) Datalinks info: ^+1 ECONOMY: {Industrial conglomerate}
Vision: While not actually weak in the original, the PeaceKeepers weren't much more successful than the modern day U.N when it came to actual conflict. They gain 2 new abilities, a sharetech upgrade (reflecting their global influence and the original vision for the 'Keepers of Wisdom'), and a semi-immunity to negative support, making democracy a less painful option than previously. * Added 'Sharetech, 3' (gains any tech owned by three other factions) Datalinks info
Vision: Somewhat altered, the spartans lose their crippling industry penalty in exchange for slightly lowered morale and a new Psi combat penalty. A powerful military machine, especially when faced with human rivals, but prone to panic when confronted with the alien terrors of Planet. * Changed 'Social, ++Morale', to 'Social, +Morale' (slightly weaker on defense) Datalinks info:
Vision: Not quite as dark and hostile as the original university, this version offers a more academic vision of the UoP - good research, poor security, a reluctance to support military endeavors, and a new resistance to psychic attack. This new benefit adds a new dimension to the UoP, and allows a green university to better combat its religious and military rivals. Changes: Datalinks info: END OF LIST. If good for nothing else, I hope this will reopen some debate on the merits of each faction, and the general design of the game - heavily suited to conqueror rush type tactics. |
Valtarien |
posted 06-17-99 03:22 PM ET
Interesting. How many other people have tried this? |
Timexwatch |
posted 06-17-99 04:13 PM ET
Why don't you write this all into a zip and upload it to The Arrival or Chirion Archives or Apolyton where many people might enjoy it. |
Timexwatch |
posted 06-17-99 04:18 PM ET
Why don't you write this all into a zip and upload it to The Arrival or Chirion Archives or Apolyton where many people might enjoy it. |
Shining1 |
posted 06-24-99 07:42 AM ET
Wakeup. |
googlie |
posted 07-07-99 02:13 PM ET
Shining 1 I presume there's nothing in the v 4.0 txt that makes redundant any of your changes (will need to re-enter them after overriding, of course) Googlie |
evil_conquerer |
posted 07-07-99 09:01 PM ET
Cool. However, IMHO it unbalances the game. 1. The University is *way* too powerful. They already were very powerful, and the psi bonus is one of the best in the game. That and the removal of DRONE, 4 doesn't even come close to balancing them out -- especially since polymorphic encryption is *free*. Once you get polymorphic software, the -2 probe has vanished. 2. The Morganites were balanced eariler -- Economy is the most powerful social factor in the game. The AI sucked when using them, but when played correctly they get energy and technology out of their ears. That's also why free market isn't too weak -- +2 economy does wonders. Anyhow, now they are decidedly overpowered instead of mediocre. Suggestion: Remove the free energy bank. 3. The peacekeepers are also *way* too powerful. Efficiency is admittedly a rather large loss, especially on the large maps, but sharetech, 3 is a *huge* bonus. Combined with the talent, 4 (another biggie), the votes, and the support bonus, they are unstoppable. 4. The Hive weren't *that* over-powered, but they were strong though, and toning them down a little was a good move. And I like your version better . 5. The Gaians and the Spartans were balanced earlier IMHO but they're still balanced now. Also IMHO (this can be debated a *lot*) the game wasn't biased towards the conquerers. At worst, it was slightly more biased in MP (in SP it's not a challenge to keep the conquerers at bay, given the A-not-I). The +50% base was good becuase it's more realistic anyway, but beyond that I wouldn't do that much else to strengthen the builders. The ships in port penalty should stay at 100%. Ships in port are almost completely useless, as they usually don't have even a skeleton crew on them. Remember Pearl Harbor. While removing the extra mineral in a base square is a good idea, the problem is that it's possible to found a base that doesn't have any minerals at all! This especially happens in sea bases. If you want to reduce the boreholes to 0,4,4 then you probably want to keep them at 8 turns. 0,4,4 isn't much better than normal squares, so boreholes shouldn't take 4 times (or more) as long as normal squares. Making polymorphic encryption free was a *very* bad move in my opinion. Probe teams are already on the weak side, and this makes your new University faction invincible. Sorry if I've been a little harsh in places . I hope you will take this as constructive critisism. |
Shining1 |
posted 07-08-99 05:00 AM ET
E_C: Hmmm. I don't find the UoP to be that much use in the SP game. And remember, they have a -1 Support added - now that, and the Drone problems, WAS IMPOSSIBLE to play on Transcend level. -1 Support is very bad at the start of the game, and the Psi helps to balance this. Secondly, their tech advantage is moderately to completely negated by use of probe teams. If you're used to getting the hunker seeker first, then I can see why you may have forgotten this. But there is a simple rule for all competing factions to follow in SMAC - BUILD THE HS BEFORE ZAK DOES. This should be #2 of the ten commandments to PBEM, right after 'Trust no-one, sucker.' So no, I don't agree that the UoP is way too powerful, because the tech advantage is easy to negate against the UoP. Which makes them usually quite weak, and weaker still with the support penalty, so the Psi helps to balance things. About the Morganites, I'm not so sure. Their massive economy is checked by their low population, and they receive no military benefits, so money is the only recourse they have. Morgan CANNOT population boom - ever. And freemarket social engineering gets a new penalty under the mod, since Planet now carries a +/- 20% to Psi combat. So a freemarket, which causes worm production to increase anyhow, also makes your bases more succeptible to worms - you need the extra troop movement allowed under -3 police to fight them. The peacekeepers get interesting under the mod file. Sharetech isn't such a great bonus, since the tech cost in Civ and SMAC is determined solely on how many techs you have. So trying to focus on early research of any particular field gets to be very difficult - in effect, everyone else decides for you. And as a result, the PK's virtually never lead the tech tree, which mean they are virtually always the third or fourth to get needle jets. Couple that with the effic penalty... well, it's just as well you have a happy population and can live in the governor's seat permanently. I personally NEVER lost with the Hive on Transcend. Not once. It was ridiculously powerful. And I'm not sure how you define builders vs. conquerors, but from my experience, a good conqueror rush was by far the best tactic to use in SMAC. 4-1-1 infantry, and lots of them, upgrading to 8-1-1 if necessary. And don't build much else. Bases with no minerals: exactly! This is the intention. It never happens though - you build a former with your 20 free minerals and build some forest, for a 2 2 3 income at size 1. As for sea bases, these must be near the shore until you discover Doc:Initiative, which gives you improved sea mines EARLIER than the original. Then your sea bases really take off. And 8 turns for a borehole at 0 4 4? The same as a normal mine that produces 2 2 0? No, I don't think so. Anyway, they're up to 0 5 5 and 20 turns for version 1.2, so there should be no problem. As for polymorphic encryption, it has to compete with the other special abilities available to units, which usually justified it's exclusion (personally, I don't think I ever used it). Since a stack of two units makes probe team capture impossible anyway, having drop X chaos hovertanks or artillery with radar or ships with radar and AAA or anything cheap with clean reactor, polymorphic encryption was usually a very low priority. Criticism is always welcome, however harsh . Email me if you want a copy of version 1.2, due whenever I find enough time to finish my test games, and er... upgrade it to version 4 compatibility. |
Angry Mob |
posted 07-08-99 07:10 AM ET
Shining, are all the changes you made listed in that post(6-12-99) or you made other versions? I must translate your changes to italian and it is easier for me (I don't have to confront italian files with yours) if you keep posting the changes you make rather than e-mailing me your files (btw if you want send them at [email protected]). You 'waked up' this thread instead of the 1.1 version one, does it mean that you don't like the changes you made there? I don't think so reading your response to evil_conquerer... And I do love the new Free Market Btw, how much you made the Super former ability more expensive? I'm testing your version (1.1) since a couple of week and it looks very good but I don't wanna make comments now since I don't know if that's the same version you're working on. However very good mod!! Fistandantilus |
Shining1 |
posted 07-08-99 07:53 AM ET
Fistandantilus? Sorry. I know approximately ten words in italian, and only then because I read the translation to Turandot. I don't even know if this IS italian... if it is, I would love a translation . As it stands, I have made quite a few changes since the first version AND the 1.1 version as well. SOOO, since SMAC 4.0 is out, I Suggest you hold fire on any translation of alpha.txt until I A) manage to download, install and redo the mod pack for version 4.0 and B) get around to finishing a test game after doing A. This, at current rate, should take around two years . Or at least a week, since exams have finished and thus sleep is now option (though HOMM3 is not). The rest of the file 'Blurb.txt', TechLongs, Techshorts, etc, shouldn't be affected by the new changes. After all, it's not as if Firaxis updated them last time or anything . Some random info on version 4.0 |
Analyst |
posted 07-08-99 11:25 AM ET
Hi, Shining1. You've been a busy bee while I've been away. I hope to take advantage of your work. You know, of course, that I am completely in agreement with your observations on rush bias in the game. I'll be downloading the v4.0 *patch* (not enhancement) now and am looking forward to some degree of improvement in the game (this being the event that brought me back. I'm also going to save your top post in this thread in a little text file, for future reference in modifying the rules.txt file. Would you believe that in the entire time I've been away, I've been SMAC free? My initial impulse was simply to set the game aside for a week or two to catch up on other projects neglected in my first rush of SMACing. I discovered, however, that I did not miss the game at all. Perhaps v4.0 and the Shining1 mod-SNAC will rekindle that flame. Any of the other old members of TICHQ still around? |
Aredhran |
posted 07-08-99 12:16 PM ET
Hi Analyst ! It's good to have you back... It's been what, two months ? Three ? I'm still there, and most of the others too, plus a few new faces. A lot of people are now moving to Alpha Centauri On-Line (http://www.an.i-dentity.com/ac.cgi), because people are pissed off because JKM banned Trippin Daily. Darkstar is already busy finding the new bugs in Patch 4... I think you shouldn't set your expectations too high... You're bound to be disappointed. Aredhran |
Darkstar |
posted 07-08-99 01:06 PM ET
Yes, I have version 4. And once again, I'm enjoying SMAC. Shining1, how does the Manifold Nexus affect your balance? It gives a +1 Planet rating to whatever faction that holds it. It SERIOUSLY affects certain stages of my play by being present, and if my current game is any guide, it a big draw for the Green Ho, Ms. Skye. (Although it may have been the Op Eng's natural attraction for all resources. Just because she turned a flat spot into the tallest mountain on Chiron to form a land bridge to get to it, rather than a simple pulling on the coastline to close the one tile channel doesn't mean much, does it?) And where have you posted SNAC in its incarnations (other than this thread)? Is the whole thing zipped anywhere for easy distribution to the wanton masses? -Darkstar |
Analyst |
posted 07-08-99 03:07 PM ET
Aredhran, I last posted around the first week of May. Thanks for remembering me. I don't have high expectations about patch 4.0 because I know better, but I always have hope. I figure that whoever works on this programing project must have been spending the last three months doing *something*. As for the current banning controversey, if you remember my own style, you might not be surprised if I don't express a lot of sympathy for people who cannot express disagreements with civility. I, myself, created a thread with some of the harshest indictments of this product ever posted on this forum (titled, IIRC, "Reasonable Criticism for Brother Greg and Firaxis"). I did that post in the midst of the flame wars stirred up by Yin26's fire-breathing entrance into this forum. BUT because my own crtique, while harsh, was entirely civil, everything that followed in that thread was civil as well. That thread was monitored by at least one Firaxian (who posted in it), but despite the fact that it was highly critical of their product, was never deleted and no one was ever banned because of it. Indeed, when the facts of criticsm were stripped from invective, even people like Imran had to begrudgingly admit it was a good thread and that the criticisms were valid. The only shame is that not more of the criticism in that thread have been adressed in subsequent patches. Now, I think that Firaxis could do a better job operating their forum from the point of view of the concept that something like this forum should be treated as a marketing resource, but if they don't, that hurts them more than it hurts me. My bottom line is that people who cannot rise above obnoxious, boorish, vulgar behavior have no cause for complaint about what (rather mild in this case) consequences might come their way. Further, if one laces otherwise sound thoughts with profanity and sarcastic taunts, one should not complain that the recipient failed to search in the mud for the nuggets of ore. What most of the people who wish to condemn Firaxis are failing to recognize is that personal responsibility is the flip side of the personal freedom coin. The two cannot be separated, ever, anywhere. The internet is not a magical anarchist playground where nothing one does ever has consequences. I will not weep for anyone whose fate is no more than suffering the ignomy of being reminded that breaking rules can have consequences. End of sermon. |
Darkstar |
posted 07-08-99 04:05 PM ET
Analyst, I look forward to any possible future update to the TI strategies of Version 4. -Darkstar |
Analyst |
posted 07-08-99 08:56 PM ET
Thanks for the welcome back, Darkstar. Once I get a chance to play through a TI game or two, I'll let you (and anyone else who's interested) know if I detect anything new and improved about our re-enhanced game. |
Shining1 |
posted 07-09-99 01:39 AM ET
Analyst: Well, the current crop of elite seems to consist of Darkstar, Aredhran, and a few others. I can't recall many of the T.I's being very active recently - certainly I can't remember any postings by Player2 or, well, yourself . Welcome back, though. Once I download the next patch, it shouldn't take more than 15 minutes to fix up alpha for the above changes. Darkstar: However, like the borehole cluster, the nexus is just a nice thing to have, rather than an innate rule of the game. So I doubt it will seriously unbalance the mod file to any degree. Heh heh. Maybe you can even alter it's effect in alpha? (Basicially, I don't know. Like the Monsoon thingy, it's probably already an unbalancing factor). |
Analyst |
posted 07-12-99 08:38 AM ET
Cross-posting this from another thread: "Ugh, Ugh Ugh! For the first time, I've been hit with the "this patch made my game worse, not better" syndrome. In all the versions of the game, I've never had any basic problems with the program, such as the audio tatic/feedback, crashing, etc. reported by others. In just a few sessions since installing the patch, I've had the game lock up at start, experienced several audio glitches (voiceovers infected with loud buzzing sounds) and had a crash on exit. I'm also experiencing the much longer load times reported by others. Looks like I'm going to have to uninstall and revert to version 3.0. Very Dissapointing. *sigh*" Looks like I came back for nothing. |
MechaDestroyer |
posted 07-12-99 03:11 PM ET
What does SNAC mean? SID NEIER's ALPHA CENTAURI? :0 |
Aredhran |
posted 07-13-99 03:07 AM ET
Read the second line of the first post. |
Horgawitz |
posted 07-13-99 04:04 PM ET
Shining1: I remember a while ago that you had problems when you added a third user tech and the game flipped out. Well, I think I know what happened. I have succesfully added 3 user techs with no such problems. However when I re-named the gravship hull type as "blimp" The game flipped out exactly like you said your copy did and I had to re-start my computer. I traced the probelm and found that there was one other referenct to "gravship" in alpha.txt the locust of chiron when I changed gravship to blimb there all of the bizzar problems went away, try hunting out things like this. Sorry if you already found this out. |
Jythexinvok |
posted 07-14-99 07:52 PM ET
Forgive me for such a question, but where, if anywhere, might this mod be downloaded? I like playing heavy builder games so this looks interesting. |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.18
© Madrona Park, Inc., 1998.